| Main Title |
Identification of CFC and HCFC Substitutes for Blowing Polyurethane Foam Insulation Products. |
| Author |
Howard, P. H. ;
Tunkel, J. L. ;
Hendriks, R. V. ;
|
| CORP Author |
Syracuse Research Corp., NY. Environmental Science Center.;National Risk Management Research Lab., Research Triangle Park, NC. |
| Publisher |
1996 |
| Year Published |
1996 |
| Report Number |
EPA-R-821920-01-0; EPA/600/A-96/008; |
| Stock Number |
PB96-143433 |
| Additional Subjects |
Environmental chemical substitutes ;
Blowing agents ;
Foam rubber ;
Insulating materials ;
Material substitution ;
Physical properties ;
Chemical properties ;
Boiling points ;
Thermal conductivity ;
Molecular weight ;
Hydroxyl radicals ;
Polyurethane resins ;
Fluorinated hydrocarbons ;
Cyclobutanes ;
Cyclopentanes ;
Cyclopentenes ;
Air pollution abatement ;
Chlorofluorocarbons ;
Reprints ;
Hydrochlorofluorocarbons ;
GWP(Global Warming Potential)
|
| Holdings |
| Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last
Modified |
Checkout
Status |
| NTIS |
PB96-143433 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
| Collation |
12p |
| Abstract |
The paper gives results of a systematic search to identify additional candidates as third-generation blowing agents, chemical compounds that are not stratospheric ozone depleters that can be used as substitutes for chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) and hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC) blowing agents in rigid polyurethane foam insulating materials. To identify the most promising substitutes, potential third-generation blowing agents were ranked using a methodology developed for this project. |
