| Main Title |
Economic Analysis of the Proposed TSCA Section 402(a)(3) Lead-Based Paint Accreditation and Certification Fee Rule. |
| Author |
Beekman, R. ;
Rice, C. ;
Blake-Hedges, L. ;
|
| CORP Author |
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Pollution, Prevention, and Toxics. ;ICF Kaiser, Inc., Fairfax, VA. ;Eastern Research Group, Inc., Lexington, MA. |
| Publisher |
27 Aug 1998 |
| Year Published |
1998 |
| Stock Number |
PB2000-101143 |
| Additional Subjects |
Health hazards ;
Lead-based paints ;
Rulemaking ;
Pollution regulations ;
Economic impact ;
Costs ;
Toxic Substances Control Act ;
Certification fee rule ;
Accreditation fee rule
|
| Internet Access |
|
| Holdings |
| Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last
Modified |
Checkout
Status |
| NTIS |
PB2000-101143 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
| Collation |
106p |
| Abstract |
TSCA Section 402(a)(3) directs the Administrator of EPA to impose accreditation and certification fees to cover the costs of administering and enforcing these standards and regulations in States and Tribal Areas that are not authorized to operate their own lead-based paint programs. This report supports EPA's proposed accreditation and certification fee rulemaking by: (1) estimating the total costs to administer and enforce the TSCA Section 402(a) certification program in States and Tribal Areas without an authorized program; (2) estimating the fees required to cover these costs; and (3) analyzing the potential impact of these fees on small entities and low-income and minority populations. |
