| Main Title |
Guidance on implementation of the contribute to remedial performance provision. |
| CORP Author |
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response. |
| Publisher |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response, |
| Year Published |
1987 |
| Report Number |
OSWER DIR 9360.0-13; OSWER-9360.0.13 |
| Stock Number |
PB93-963413 |
| OCLC Number |
41069587 |
| Subjects |
Hazardous wastes--United States
|
| Additional Subjects |
Superfund ;
Hazardous materials ;
Waste disposal ;
Remedial action ;
Public health ;
Risk assessment ;
Exposure ;
Land pollution control ;
Planning ;
Environmental impacts ;
Evaluation ;
Site surveys ;
Cleanup operations
|
| Internet Access |
|
| Holdings |
| Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last
Modified |
Checkout
Status |
| EJBD |
OSWER Dir 9360.0-13 |
|
Headquarters Library/Washington,DC |
03/02/2007 |
| ELBD ARCHIVE |
OSWER Dir 9360.0-13 |
Received from HQ |
AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH |
10/04/2023 |
| ELBD RPS |
OSWER Dir 9360.0-13 |
repository copy |
AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH |
11/28/2014 |
| ELBD |
OSWER Dir 9360.0-13 |
|
AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH |
01/14/2000 |
| ERAD |
OSWER Dir 9360.0-13 |
|
Region 9 Library/San Francisco,CA |
01/25/2002 |
DISPERSAL |
| ESAD |
OSWER 9360.0-13 |
|
Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA |
03/23/2010 |
| NTIS |
PB93-963413 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
| Collation |
6 p. |
| Abstract |
The provision promotes the performance of removal actions that address threats more efficiently by considering the overall site cleanup before the start of the action. To the maximum extent practicable, removal actions should be desigend to avoid wasteful, repetitive, short-term actions that do not contribute to the efficient, cost-effective performance of long-term remedial actions to be taken by the EPA, State, or other party. The major objective of this requirement is to provide maximum protection of public health and the environment at minimal cost by avoidance of removal restarts. The focus of this provision is on avoidance of restarts that are due to recurring threats that were not adequately abated in the original removal action, and threats from deteriorating site conditions that should have been foreseen. |
| Notes |
"April 6, 1987." |
