Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 21 OF 22

Main Title Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project. Final Report on Land Covering Mapping Methods.
CORP Author Utah State Univ., Logan. Coll. of Natural Resources. ;Colorado Div. of Wildlife, Denver. ;Environmental Protection Agency, Las Vegas, NV. National Exposure Research Lab.;Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ.
Publisher 13 Oct 2005
Year Published 2005
Stock Number PB2006-102816
Subjects Gap analysis ; Mapping ; Land cover mapping ; Southwest regional program ; Modeling ; Wildlife habitat ; Biodiversity ; Gap analysis program ; State-centered ; Regional programs ; Giospatial data ; US Geological Survey
Additional Subjects Gap analysis ; Mapping ; Land cover mapping ; Southwest regional program ; Modeling ; Wildlife habitat ; Biodiversity ; Gap analysis program ; State-centered ; Regional programs ; Giospatial data ; US Geological Survey
Internet Access
Description Access URL
http://www.epa.gov/esd/land-sci/nv_geospatial/images/128_Maps_3up_Web.pdf
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
NTIS  PB2006-102816 Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. 07/26/2022
Collation 54p
Abstract
For more than a decade the USGS Gap Analysis Program has focused considerable effort on mapping land cover to assist in the modeling of wildlife habitat and biodiversity for large geographic areas. The GAP Analysis Program has been traditionally state-centered; each state having the responsibility of implementing a project design for the geographic area within their state boundaries. The Southwest Regional Gap Analysis Project (SWReGAP) was the first formal GAP project designed at a regional, multi-state scale. The project area comprises the southwestern states of Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah. Project duration lasted approximately 5 years, beginning in 1999 and ending in 2004. The land cover map was generated using regionally consistent geospatial data (Landsat ETM+ imagery and DEM derivatives), similar field data collection protocols, a standardized land cover legend, and a common modeling approach (decision tree classifier). Partitioning of mapping responsibilities amongst the 5 collaborating states was organized around ecoregion based 'mapping zones.' Over the course of three field seasons approximately 93,000 field samples were collected to train the land cover modeling effort. Land cover modeling was done using a decision tree classifier. This report presents an overview of the methodologies used to create the regional land cover dataset and highlights issues associated with achieving this collaborative product through a regionally coordinated process.