Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 37 OF 411

OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Combined sewer overflow treatment by screening and terminal ponding : Fort Wayne, Indiana /
Author Prah, Delmar H. ; Brunner, Paul L.
Other Authors
Author Title of a Work
Brunner, Paul L.,
CORP Author Fort Wayne, IN.;Municipal Environmental Research Lab., Cincinnati, OH.
Publisher Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory ; For sale by the National Technical Information Service,
Year Published 1979
Report Number EPA-600/2-79-085
Stock Number PB80-119399
OCLC Number 06586685
ISBN pbk.
Subjects Combined sewer overflows--Indiana. ; Sewage--Purification--Chlorination. ; Sewage lagoons. ; Combined sewers--Indiana--Overflows
Additional Subjects Combined sewers ; Protectors ; Sewage treatment ; Overflows ; Performance evaluation ; Ponds ; Removal ; Efficiency ; Cost analysis ; Biochemical oxygen demand ; Chlorination ; Coliform bacteria ; Flow rate ; Maumee River ; Lake Erie ; Indiana ; Screening equipment
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=300007D3.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EHAM  TD662.P73 1979x Region 1 Library/Boston,MA 04/29/2016
EJBD ARCHIVE EPA 600/2-79-085 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 01/16/2014
EJBD  EPA 600/2-79-085 c.1 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 01/16/2014
ELAD  EPA 600-2-79-085 Region 5 Library/Chicago,IL 02/08/2010
ELBD  EPA 600-2-79-085 AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 01/02/1998
ESAD  EPA 600-2-79-085 Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA 03/23/2010
NTIS  PB80-119399 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. 06/23/1988
Collation xiii, 125 pages : illustrations ; 28 cm.
Abstract
A 75 MGD combined sewer overflow treatment facility was constructed to obtain plant-scale data on the effectiveness and costs of screening combined sewer overflows (CSO) by three types of fine screens. The methods of screening evaluated included fixed side hill screens, rotary centrifugal fine screening, and horizontal rotary drum fine screening. Also evaluated were the benefits to the receiving waters by pollutant removal by screening, chlorination, and ponding previously by-passed CSO. Each of 38 separate CSO events were analyzed over a 13-month period commencing in January, 1975 for 14 pollutant parameters and flow rates. None of the screening methods studied have removal efficiencies for suspended solids, BOD5, COD and nutrients that were significantly different from zero at the 95% confidence level. No effect between hydraulic loading and removal efficiency was found. The least overall cost method of screening was the fixed vertical-type screen. All the screens studied have hydraulic head requirements on the order of 2 to 10 feet static loss. The two-day terminal pond following screening was shown to be capable of meeting 30 mg/l of BOD5 and suspended solids 95 percent of the days studied over the 4-year evaluation period.
Notes
Prepared by Howard Needles Tammen & Bergendoff, and City Utilities, Water Pollution Control Plant, under grant no. 11020 GYU. Issued Aug. 1979. Includes bibliographical references (page 124).