| Main Title |
Evaluation of stationary source particulate measurement methods. Volume II, Oil-fired steam generators / |
| Author |
Peters, Edward T.
|
| Other Authors |
|
| CORP Author |
Little (Arthur D.), Inc., Cambridge, Mass.;Environmental Sciences Research Lab., Research Triangle Park, N.C. Emissions Measurement and Characterization Div. |
| Publisher |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory, |
| Year Published |
1977 |
| Report Number |
EPA 600/2-77/026; EPA-68-02-0632 |
| Stock Number |
PB-269 081 |
| OCLC Number |
40122339 |
| Subjects |
Steam-boilers ;
Particle size determination ;
Air--Pollution ;
Air--Pollution ;
Particle size determination ;
Steam-boilers
|
| Additional Subjects |
Particles ;
Electric power plants ;
Sulfur dioxide ;
Sampling ;
Field tests ;
Filters ;
Air pollution ;
Sulfur dioxide ;
Flue gases ;
Experiments ;
Sulfates ;
Probes ;
Steam electric power generation ;
Performance evaluation ;
Concentration(Composition) ;
Combustion products ;
Industrial wastes ;
Tables(Data) ;
Gas analysis ;
Chemical analysis ;
Stationary sources ;
EPA method 5 ;
Air pollution sampling ;
Steam power plants ;
Air pollution detection
|
| Internet Access |
|
| Holdings |
| Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last
Modified |
Checkout
Status |
| EJBD |
EPA 600-2-77-026 |
c.1 |
Headquarters Library/Washington,DC |
04/17/2014 |
| EKBD |
EPA-600/2-77-026 |
|
Research Triangle Park Library/RTP, NC |
06/20/2003 |
| ELBD ARCHIVE |
EPA 600-2-77-026 |
Received from HQ |
AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH |
10/04/2023 |
| ESAD |
EPA 600-2-77-026 |
|
Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA |
03/23/2010 |
| NTIS |
PB-269 081 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
| Collation |
ix, 61 p. ; 28 cm. |
| Abstract |
An experimental study was conducted to determine the reliability of the Method 5 procedure for providing particulate emission data from an oil-fired steam generator. The study was concerned with determining whether any 'false' particulate resulted from the collection process of from the collected particulate. Variations to Method 5 tested included filter media, size and temperature, nozzle type and sampling duration. Tests were conducted at a 350 MW source utilizing low sulfur residual fuel. Two series of field tests were conducted. In both cases simultaneous samples were collected with two trains. In all cases one train was the standard Method 5 train. The other train was either a modified Method 5 train with an in-stack filter or a second standard Method 5 train. Runs were preformed in which one or both trains were spiked with SO2 at the nozzle to provide sampled gas stream concentrations of approximately 2000 ppm SO2 approximating a high sulfur fuel. By comparing particulate and sulfate distributions between probe and filter catches for the two trains, no evidence for the formation of 'false particulate' for the condition evaluation were found. The in-stack filter method used has several advantages over EPA Method 5 including the elimination of recovering the probe catch. |
| Notes |
"EPA-600/2-77-026." "EPA project officer: Kenneth T. Knapp". Includes bibliographical references. |
