||Economic impact of implementing two RACT guidelines in the state of Alabama Final report.
||Booz-Allen and Hamilton, Inc., Florham Park, NJ. Foster D. Snell Div.;Environmental Protection Agency, Atlanta, GA. Region IV.
||U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region IV, Air and Hazardous Materials Division,
||EPA 904/9-79-038; EPA-68-02-2544
Air quality--Economic aspects--Alabama ;
Air pollution ;
Economic impact ;
Industrial wastes ;
Benefit cost analysis ;
Chlorine organic compounds ;
State government ;
Air pollution abatement ;
Reasonably available control technology ;
EPA Region 4 ;
Freon 113 ;
||Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy.
||1 v. (various pagings) ; 28 cm.
The major objective of the contract effort was to determine the direct economic impact of implementing Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) standards for selected industrial categories in Alabama. The study is to be used primarily to assist EPA and state decisions on achieving the emission limitations of the RACT standards. The economic impact was assessed for the following 2 RACT industrial categories: surface coating of cans and metal furniture. The scope of this project was to determine the costs and direct impact of control to achieve RACT guideline limitations. Direct economic costs and benefits from the implementation of RACT limitations were identified and quantified while secondary impacts (social, energy, employment, etc.) are addressed, they were not a major emphasis in the study.
Prepared by Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Inc. "EPA 904/9-79-038." "May, 1979". "April 1979"--Cover. Includes bibliography.