| Main Title |
Report to Congress : small systems arsenic implementation issues. |
| CORP Author |
Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Water. |
| Publisher |
United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, |
| Year Published |
2002 |
| Report Number |
EPA 815-R-02-003 |
| Stock Number |
PB2005-100224 |
| OCLC Number |
890946288 |
| Subjects |
Drinking water--Arsenic content--United States
|
| Additional Subjects |
Arsenic ;
Drinking water ;
Implementation ;
Assistance plans ;
Technical assistance ;
Training ;
Capacity ;
Effectiveness ;
Variances ;
Affordability ;
Reviews ;
Challenges ;
Small systems ;
Exemptions ;
Program implementation ;
Congressional reports ;
1996 Safe Drinking Water Amendments ;
Environmental Protection Agency
|
| Internet Access |
|
| Holdings |
| Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last
Modified |
Checkout
Status |
| EJBD |
EPA-815-R-02-003 |
|
Headquarters Library/Washington,DC |
08/20/2015 |
| ELBD ARCHIVE |
EPA-815-R-02-003 |
Received from HQ |
AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH |
10/04/2023 |
| NTIS |
PB2005-100224 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
| Abstract |
This report to Congress addresses EPA's national-level affordability criteria and small systems implementation issues related to achieving compliance with the Arsenic in Drinking Water Rule. As part of the 2002 appropriations process, Congress directed EPA to 'begin immediately to review the Agency's affordability criteria and how small system variance and exemption programs should be implemented for arsenic' as well as to 'recommend procedures to grant an extension of time in meeting the compliance requirement for small communities when a community can showthat compliance by 2006 poses an undue economic hardship on that community.' Congress further directed the Agency to prepare a report 'by March 1, 2002 on its review of the affordability criteria and the administrative actions undertaken or planned to be undertaken by the Agency, as well as potential funding mechanisms for small community compliance and other legislative actions, which, if taken by the Congress, would best achieve appropriate extensions of time for small communities while also guaranteeing maximum compliance.' |
| Notes |
"March 2002." "EPA 815-R-02-003." |
