Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 1816 OF 1822

Main Title Wet scrubber liquid utilization /
Author Semrau, Konrad T. ; Semrau, Konrad Troxel ; Witham., Clyde L.
Other Authors
Author Title of a Work
Witham, Clyde L.
CORP Author Stanford Research Inst., Menlo Park, Calif.;National Environmental Research Center, Research Triangle Park, N.C. Control Systems Lab.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Environmental Research Center, Control Systems Laboratory,
Year Published 1974
Report Number EPA 650/2-74/108; EPA-68-02-1079; EPA-ROAP-21ADJ-005
Stock Number PB-237 749
OCLC Number 39177688
Subjects Scrubber (Chemical technology)
Additional Subjects Scrubbers ; Air pollution control equipment ; Performance evaluation ; Particles ; Efficiency ; Condensation ; Evaporation ; Liquid saturation ; Gas flow ; Fluid friction ; Aerosols ; Energy consumption
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=9101RCHB.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
ELBD ARCHIVE EPA-650-2-74-108 Received from HQ AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 10/04/2023
ELBD ARCHIVE EPA 650-2-74-108 AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 03/23/2022
NTIS  PB-237 749 Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. 07/26/2022
Collation x, [116] pages : illustrations ; 27 cm
Abstract
The report gives results of bench-scale experiments on the ways in which energy consumption, liquid-to-gas ratio (L/G), and water vapor condensation affect the collection efficiency of a conventional, cocurrent-contact, orifice-type particulate scrubber. The test aerosol consisted of spherical particles of ammonium fluorescein with a mass-median diameter of about 0.6 micron. Scrubber collection efficiency was determined and correlated as a function of the effective friction loss across the scrubber. Without condensation or evaporation effects, scrubber efficiency was dependent only upon effective friction loss, with no independent influences of gas velocity, L/G, or contactor orifice size, except possibly in the range of very low gas velocities, L/G, and pressure drops. Large amounts of water evaporation reduced collection efficiencies; but scrubbing hot humid gas with cold water (to produce condensation) significantly increased collection efficiency. The most favorable results were obtained by presaturating the hot humid gas stream before contacting it with cold water.
Notes
"EPA-650/2-74/108." EPA contract no. 68-02-1079, ROAP no. 21ADJ-005, program element no. 1AB012. EPA project officer: Leslie E. Sparks. Pages 115 and 116 lacking in paper copy; found in microfiche version (PB 237 749). Includes bibliographical references (pages 99-101).