| Main Title |
Woodstove Emission Measurement Methods: Comparison and Emission Factors Update. |
| Author |
McCrillis, R. C. ;
Jaasma, D. R. ;
|
| CORP Author |
Virginia Polytechnic Inst. and State Univ., Blacksburg.;Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Air and Energy Engineering Research Lab. |
| Publisher |
c1993 |
| Year Published |
1993 |
| Report Number |
EPA-A00818389; EPA/600/J-94/055; |
| Stock Number |
PB94-143807 |
| Additional Subjects |
Combustion products ;
Air pollution sampling ;
Wood burning appliances ;
Air pollution control ;
Exhaust emissions ;
Field tests ;
Stoves ;
Particulates ;
Carbon monoxide ;
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons ;
Burning rate ;
Stationary sources ;
Reprints ;
EPA Method 5G ;
EPA Method 5H
|
| Holdings |
| Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last
Modified |
Checkout
Status |
| NTIS |
PB94-143807 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
| Collation |
14p |
| Abstract |
Since woodstoves are tested for certification in the laboratory using EPA Methods 5G and 5H, it is of interest to determine the correlation between these regulatory methods and the inhouse equipment. Two inhouse sampling systems have been used mostwidely: one is an intermittent, pump-driven particulate sampler that collects particulate and condensible organics on a filter and organic adsorbent resin; and the other uses an evacuated cylinder as the motive force and particulate and condensible organics are collected in a condenser and dual filter. Both samplers can operate unattended for 1-week periods. A large number of tests have been run comparing Methods 5G and 5H to both samplers. The paper presents these comparison data and determines the relationships between regulations and field samplers. |
