Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog


OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title National Drinking Water Advisory Council Report on the CCL Classification Process to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
CORP Author Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Drinking Water.
Publisher 19 May 2004
Year Published 2004
Stock Number PB2005-102156
Additional Subjects Classification processes ; Drinking water ; Recommendations ; Contaminant Candidate List(CCL) ; National Drinking Water Advisory Council ; Microbial contaminants ; Chemical contaminants ; Screening agents ; United States ; Public health ; Potable water ; Work groups ; National research councils ; National Academy of Science ; Environmental Protection Agency
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
NTIS  PB2005-102156 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. 05/04/2005
Collation 192p
This report presents recommendations from the National Drinking Water Advisory Council (NDWAC) to the Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. The report was prepared by the NDWAC's Work Group on the Contaminant Candidate List (CCL) Classification Process. The Work Group prepared the report for consideration by the NDWAC. After the deliberations, the Council unanimously approved and adopted the NDWAC Work Group's report on the CCL Classification Process with one minor clarification. The Charge to the CCL Work Group was to evaluate recommendations made by the National Academy of Science's National Research Council, including methodologies, activities and analysis, and to make recommendations for an expanded approach to the CCL listing process for the purpose of protecting public health. The Work Group's deliberations and recommendations focused on the overall implementation strategy and methodology that EPA should use to develop the CCL. In developing this report the Work Group developed recommendations on a phased adaptive management approach, identified methods to select and validate new classification approaches, and provided a framework for obtaining input from experts and stakeholders.