Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 2 OF 3

Main Title Cost Evaluation Strategies for Technologies Tested Under the Environmental Technology Verification Program.
Author Gavaskar, Arun ; Cumming, Lydia ;
CORP Author Battelle, Columbus, OH.;National Risk Management Research Lab., Cincinnati, OH. Office of Research and Development.
Publisher Apr 2001
Year Published 2001
Report Number EPA-68-C7-0008; EPA/600/R-99/100;
Stock Number PB2005-108392
Additional Subjects Environmental technologies ; Cost evaluation ; Capital investment ; Guidelines ; Strategies ; Reporting requirements ; Data collection ; Recommendations ; Methodology ; Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) Program ; Operational and Maintenance (O&M) costs
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=30005WSL.PDF
http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS68085
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
NTIS  PB2005-108392 Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. 07/26/2022
Collation 42 p.
Abstract
The objective of this document is to provide a general set of guidelines that may be consistently applied for collecting, evaluating, and reporting the costs of technologies tested under the Environmental Technology Verification (ETV) Program. Because of the diverse nature of the technologies and industries covered in this program, each ETV pilot has the flexibility for any of the following options to be used: No cost evaluation Itemization of costs Estimation of capital investment and operation and maintenance (O&M) costs Calculation of total annualized cost, simple payback period, or present value. The four cost options are incremental; each successive option builds on and incorporates all of the elements of the previous options to provide a comprehensive cost evaluation. A comprehensive reporting format, which includes cost evaluation objectives and data collection methods, estimates of capital investment and O&M costs, cost analysis, list of assumptions, technical factors affecting costs, and intangible benefits and/or disadvantages of the technology, is recommended.
Notes
Contract No. 68-C7-0008; Work Assignment No. 3-16