Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog


Main Title Economic impact analysis of proposed effluent limitations guidelines and standards for the pesticide formulating, packaging, and repackaging industry
Author Tudor, Lynne G.
CORP Author Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Office of Water.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Science and Technology, Engineering and Analysis Division,
Year Published 1994
Report Number EPA 821-R-94-003;68-C0-0080;68-C3-0302
Stock Number PB94-181401
OCLC Number 31028098
Subjects Effluent quality ; Pesticides industry--Environmental aspects ; Pesticides--Formulation ; Pesticides--Packaging
Additional Subjects Pesticides ; Chemical industry ; Water pollution economics ; Economic impact ; Water pollution standards ; Water pollution control ; Cost effectiveness ; Best cost analysis ; Market analysis ; Alternatives ; Formulations ; Materials handling ; Packaging ; Chemical effluents ; Requirements ; Standards compliance ; Pollution regulations ; Repackaging
Internet Access
Description Access URL
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
EJBD ARCHIVE EPA 821-R-94-003 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 05/08/2014
EJBD  EPA 821-R-94-003 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 01/03/2018
ELBD  EPA 821-R-94-003 AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 06/05/1998
NTIS  PB94-181401 Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. 07/26/2022
Collation 1 v. (various pagings) : ill. ; 28 cm.
The Economic Impact Analysis (EIA) assesses the economic impact of proposed guidelines and standards under the Clean Water Act for the Pesticide Formulating, Packaging, and Repackaging (PFPR) subcategories of the Pesticide Chemicals Point Source Category (40 CFR 355). For the regulation, EPA divided the existing PFPR subcategory into two subcategories: (1) Subcategory C: Pesticide Chemicals formulating, Packaging, and Repackaging; and (2) Subcategory E: Repackaging of Agricultural Chemicals Performed at Refilling Establishments. The regulation includes limitations for Best Practicable Control Technology (BPT), Best Conventional Pollutant Control Technology (BCT), Best Available Technoogy Economically Achievable (BAT), New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) and Pretreatment Standards for Existing and New Sources (PSES and PSNS). Because BCT and BAT requirements match the established BPT requirements, no additional costs are expected for compliance with the BCT and BAT limitations. Accordingly, this EIA focuses on analyzing alternative PSES options.
"March 1994"--Cover. "United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water"--Cover. "EPA 821-R-94-003"--Cover. "Performed under Contracts 68-C0-0080 and 68-C3-0302"--P. {4} of cover. Includes bibliographical references.