| Main Title |
CSO disinfection pilot study Spring Creek CSO storage facility upgrade / [electronic resource] : |
| Author |
Wojtenko, Izabela. ;
Wojtenko, I. ;
Stinson, M. K.
|
| Other Authors |
|
| CORP Author |
Environmental Protection Agency, Edison, NJ. Urban Watershed Research Facility.;National Risk Management Research Lab., Cincinnati, OH. Water Supply and Water Resources Div. |
| Publisher |
National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, |
| Year Published |
2003 |
| Report Number |
EPA/600/R-02/077 |
| Stock Number |
PB2007-106191 |
| Subjects |
Combined sewer overflows--New York (State)--New York ;
Water--Purification--New York (State)--New York ;
Spring Creek (New York, NY)
|
| Additional Subjects |
US EPA ;
Disinfection study ;
Pilot testing ;
Treatment evaluation ;
Five technologies ;
Combined sewer overflow facilities ;
Costs ;
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ;
Combined sewer overflow (CSO) facilities
|
| Internet Access |
|
| Holdings |
| Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last
Modified |
Checkout
Status |
| NTIS |
PB2007-106191 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
| Collation |
1 online resource (viii, 44 p.) : digital, PDF file |
| Abstract |
This Research Summary presents the results of a pilot-scale disinfection study performed for the New York City Department of Environmental Protection and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) under a contract No. 7C-R394-NTLX to Camp Dresser & McKee of Woodbury, New York. The main objective of the pilot study was to demonstrate alternatives to hypochlorite disinfection for application to the Spring Creek facility and potentially to other combined sewer overflow (CSO) facilities. The pilot testing was divided into two phases. Phase I was performed from December 1996 through March 1997, and Phase II was performed from August through November 1999. US EPA provided technical assistance to the entire study. Phase I evaluated treatment performance of five technologies: ultraviolet (UV) irradiation; ozonation (O3); chlorine dioxide (ClO2) disinfection; chlorination/dechlorination (Cl2/deCl2); and electron beam irradiation (E-Beam). The fifth technology, E-Beam was evaluated during supplemental Phase I pilot testing sponsored by the New York Power Authority and the Electric Power Research Institute. Based on the results from Phase I, Phase II provided additional evaluation of technologies that had shown potential for CSO applications. These were UV, ClO2, and Cl2/deCl2. This Research Summary concentrates on these three technologies, but the overall results of both phases for each technology along with the cost are also discussed. |
| Notes |
Title from title screen (viewed Dec. 16, 2010). "November 2003." Includes bibliographical references (p. 44). "Contract number: 7C-R394-NTLX." "EPA/600/R-02/077." |
