Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 31 OF 108

Main Title Evaluation of operation and maintenance factors limiting municipal wastewater treatment plant performance : phase II /
Author Hegg, Bob A., ; Rakness, Kerwin L. ; Schultz, James R. ; DeMers., Larry D.
Other Authors
Author Title of a Work
Hegg, Bob A.
CORP Author M and I, Inc., Fort Collins, CO.;Municipal Environmental Research Lab., Cincinnati, OH.
Publisher Municipal Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Available to the public through the National Technical Information Service.
Year Published 1980
Report Number EPA-600/2-80-129; EPA-68-03-2572
Stock Number PB81-112864
OCLC Number 06958995
Subjects Sewage disposal plants--Evaluation
Additional Subjects Sewage treatment ; Performance evaluation ; Maintenance ; Standards ; Sites ; Activated sludge treatment ; Clarifiers ; Aeration ; Aerobic processes
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=30000DD2.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EHAM  TD746EPA-600/2-80-129 Region 1 Library/Boston,MA 04/29/2016
EJBD  EPA 600-2-80-129 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 12/27/2013
ELBD ARCHIVE EPA 600-2-80-129 Received from HQ AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 10/04/2023
ERAD  EPA 600/2-80-129 Region 9 Library/San Francisco,CA 10/09/2012
ESAD  EPA 600-2-80-129 Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA 11/07/1997
NTIS  PB81-112864 Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. 07/26/2022
Collation x, 159 pages : illustrations, map ; 28 cm.
Abstract
Many of the country's wastewater treatment plants do not meet design expectations and NPDES permit standards. A research project was initiated to identify, quantify and rank the causes of this poor performance by comprehensive evaluations of 50 plants in nine western states. The identified highest ranking causes of limited plant performance reflect an inability of in-plant personnel to optimize process control and the performance of existing facilities. Deficiencies in design features also ranked high. The performance of each plant is typically limited by a unique combination of problems which require individual identification and elimination. The Composite Correction Program (CCP) was introduced and demonstrated. This approach to improving the performance of existing facilities was conducted at selected facilities. Areas of special evaluation include aerator and clarifier design, sludge production in activated sludge plants, aerobic digester operation, reference materials used in treatment plants, operator time and tasks before and after a CCP, and the effects of toxic substances on well-operated treatment facilities.
Notes
"M & I, Inc., Consulting Engineers." "August 1980." Includes bibliographical references. "Contract no. 68-03-2572."