| Main Title |
Comparing the Field and Laboratory Emission Cell (FLEC) with Traditional Emissions Testing Chambers. |
| Author |
Roache, N. F. ;
Guo, Z. ;
Fortmann, R. ;
Tichenor, B. A. ;
|
| CORP Author |
Acurex Environmental Corp., Research Triangle Park, NC.;Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC. Air and Energy Engineering Research Lab. |
| Publisher |
9 Jan 94 |
| Year Published |
1994 |
| Report Number |
EPA-68-D4-0005; EPA/600/A-95/094; |
| Stock Number |
PB95-241295 |
| Additional Subjects |
Paints ;
Waxes ;
Air pollution control ;
Field tests ;
Performance tests ;
Indoor air pollution ;
Stationary sources ;
Velocity measurement ;
Floors ;
Latex ;
Test chambers ;
FLEC(Field and Laboratory Emissions Cell)
|
| Holdings |
| Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last
Modified |
Checkout
Status |
| NTIS |
PB95-241295 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
| Collation |
28p |
| Abstract |
The paper discusses a series of tests, designed to evaluate the performance of the Field and Laboratory Emission Cell (FLEC) as applied to the testing of emissions for two indoor coating materials (floor wax and latex paint). The tests included validation of the repeatability of the test method, evaluation of the effect of different air velocities on source emissions, and a comparison of FLEC versus small chamber characterization of emissions. The FLEC exhibited good repeatability in characterizing emissions when applied to both sources under identical conditions. Tests with different air velocities showed significant effects on the emissions from latex paint, yet little effect on emissions from floor wax. |
