||Economic implications of regulating chlorofluorocarbon emissions from nonaerosol applications.
Palmer, Adele R. ;
Mooz, William E. ;
Quinn, Timothy H. ;
Wolf, Kathleen A.
||United States. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances.
|| U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances,
||EPA-560/12-80-001; R-2524-EPA; EPA-68-01-3882; EPA-68-01-6111
Air--Pollution--Economic aspects--United States. ;
Chlorofluoromethane--Environmental aspects--United States. ;
Chlorofluorocarbons--Environmental aspects--United States. ;
Air--Pollution--Law and legislation--Economic aspects--United States.
Air--Pollution--Economic aspects--United States ;
Chlorofluoromethane--Environmental aspects--United States ;
Chlorofluorocarbons--Environmental aspects--United States ;
Air--Pollution--Law and legislation--Economic aspects--United States ;
Air pollution control ;
Economic impact ;
Chlorine organic compounds ;
Fluorine organic compounds ;
Air conditioners ;
Air pollution abatement ;
||OCSPP Chemical Library/Washington,DC
||Region 9 Library/San Francisco,CA
||Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown.
||xx, 292 pages : illustrations ; 28 cm
The study examines and compares the outcomes of two alternate methods for controlling nonaerosol emissions of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). Conventional regulatory methods such as technology standards are compared with innovative methods of regulation such as use taxes or production quotas distributed through the use of marketable permits. The economic costs of each system are calculated and compared, along with a discussion of the policy issues which must be addressed when choosing one form of regulation over another.
Authors: Adele R. Palmer and others. "Regulatory Impacts Branch, Economics & Technology Division, Office of Toxic Substances." October 1980. "Contract no. 68-01-3882 & 68-01-6111." Includes bibliographical references (pages 289-292).