| Main Title |
Recycling nickel electroplating rinse waters by low temperature evaporation and reverse osmosis / |
| Author |
Lindsey, Timothy C. ;
Randall, P. M.
|
| Other Authors |
|
| CORP Author |
Illinois Dept. of Energy and Natural Resources, Champaign. Hazardous Waste Research and Information Center.;Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. Risk Reduction Engineering Lab. |
| Publisher |
Risk Reduction Engineering Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, |
| Year Published |
1993 |
| Report Number |
EPA/600/R-93/160; EPA-CR-815829 |
| Stock Number |
PB93-218865 |
| Subjects |
Sewage--Purification--Nickle removal ;
Sewage--Purification--Reverse osmosis process ;
Factory and trade waste--Recycling
|
| Additional Subjects |
Water pollution control ;
Vacuum evaporation ;
Reverse osmosis ;
Waste water ;
Electroplating ;
Industrial wastes ;
Waste recycling ;
Operating costs ;
Cost analysis ;
Technology transfer ;
Performance evaluation ;
Treatment technology ;
Nickel plating
|
| Internet Access |
|
| Holdings |
| Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last
Modified |
Checkout
Status |
| NTIS |
PB93-218865 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
| Collation |
72 pages : illustrations ; 28 cm |
| Abstract |
Low temperature evaporation and reverse osmosis systems were each evaluated (on a pilot scale) on their respective ability to process rinse water collected from a nickel electroplating operation. Each system offered advantages under specific operating conditions. The low temperature evaporation system was best suited to processing solutions with relatively high (greater than 4,000 to 5,000 mg/L) nickel concentrations. The reverse osmosis system was best adapted to conditions where the feed solution had a relatively low (less than4,000 to 5,000 mg/L) nickel concentration. In electroplating operations where relatively dilute rinse water solutions must be concentrated to levels acceptable for replacement in the plating bath, a combination of the two technologies might provide the best process alternative. |
| Notes |
"August 1993." "Project officer: Paul M. Randall." "EPA/600/R-93/160." Includes bibliographical references. Microfiche. |
