Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 25 OF 64

Main Title Hazard ranking system issue analysis : targets distance limit for surface water /
Author Burger, Carol K.
Other Authors
Author Title of a Work
Kushner, Lawrence M.
CORP Author United States. Environmental Protection Agency.
Publisher MITRE Corp.,
Year Published 1986
Report Number MTR-86W84; EPA 540-R-86-021
OCLC Number 17660141
Subjects Hazardous wastes
Additional Subjects Hazardous waste
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=9100WIYH.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EJAM  TD811.5.H181 Region 3 Library/Philadelphia, PA 01/01/1988
EJBD  EPA 540-R-86-021 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 04/30/2014
ELBD  EPA 540-2-87-517 AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 04/04/2012
ELBD ARCHIVE EPA 540-R-86-021 Received from HQ AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 10/04/2023
EMBD  MTR-86W84 NRMRL/GWERD Library/Ada,OK 04/15/1994
ERAM  TD193.5.B8 1986 HWC Region 9 Library/San Francisco,CA 01/01/1988
ESAD  EPA 0184 Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA 01/01/1988
Collation vii, 131 p. ; 28 cm.
Notes
"August 1986"--T.p. "MTR-86W84"--T.p. "Sponsor: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency"--T.p. "Contract no.: EPA 68-01-7054"--T.p. EPA 540-R-86-021, per NSCEP's publication title list for this publication.
Contents Notes
This report describes an analysis intended to show whether available data for Superfund sites support the present distance limits (3 miles in streams and rivers, or 1 mile in static water) used for scoring the surface water pathway target population in the Hazard Ranking System. The data, concentrations of released substances at various distances from their points of entry into surface waters, were limited, by agreement with the sponsor, to what was available in the National Priorities List (NPL) site files and remedial investigation reports. There are insufficient data to allow drawing any conclusions for the static water case. However, the available data suggest that the 3-mile targets distance limit for streams and rivers warrants upward modification, at least for those cases in which no observed release has been shown. The data do not permit making a recommendation as to what farther distance limit should be used.