Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 32 OF 76

Main Title Evaluation of the Technological Feasibility, and Cost of Selected Control Alternatives Necessary to Meet the Proposed Ohio SO2 Regulations for Industrial Boilers and Processes. Volume V. Phillips Petroleum, Toledo Philblack Plant, Carbon Black.
Author Klemm, Hans A. ; Hall., Robert R. ;
CORP Author GCA Corp., Bedford, Mass. GCA Technology Div.;Environmental Protection Agency, Chicago, Ill. Air and Hazardous Materials Div.
Year Published 1976
Report Number GCA-TR-76-14-G-Vol-5; EPA-68-01-3155; EPA/905/2-76/005-e;
Stock Number PB-268 958
Additional Subjects Carbon black ; Boilers ; Sulfur dioxide ; Air pollution control ; Ohio ; Industrial wastes ; Combustion products ; Feasibility ; Cost analysis ; Capitalized costs ; Operating costs ; Regulations ; Sites ; Plant location ; Air pollution control equipment ; Scrubbers ; Calcium oxides ; Flue gases ; Process charting ; Design criteria ; Performance evaluation ; Sludge disposal ; Solid waste disposal ; Alkaline scrubbing ; Limestone scrubbing
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified		 Checkout
Status
NTIS  PB-268 958 Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. 07/26/2022
Collation 47p
Abstract
This report presents an evaluation by the GCA Corporation, GCA/Technology Division, of technological feasibility and cost of complying with the proposed Ohio sulfur dioxide regulation (40 FR 52410, November 10, 1975) at the Phillips Petroleum Company's Toledo Philblack Plant. The final USEPA Sulfur Dioxide Control Strategy for the State of Ohio Technical Support Documents, Vol. I and II, (EPA 905/2-76-002) may be obtained from NTIS. This plant manufactures carbon black by the oil furnace process. Sulfur dioxide emissions occur from the combustion of off-gasses in product dryers, an incinerator, and CO boilers. The technological feasibility of flue gas desulfurization by the double alkali process (FMC) and by the lime process (Research-Cottrell) was evaluated along with cost of compliance for the latter process.