Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog

RECORD NUMBER: 8 OF 13

Main Title Evaluation of a proportional sampler for automotive exhaust emissions /
Author Gabele., Peter A.
Other Authors
Author Title of a Work
Gabele, Peter A.
CORP Author Environmental Sciences Research Lab., Research Triangle Park, N.C.
Publisher Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,
Year Published 1977
Report Number EPA-600/2-77-236
Stock Number PB278186
OCLC Number 55704629
Subjects Automobiles--Motors--Exhaust gas ; Air--Pollution--United States--Measurement ; Air--Pollution--Measurement
Additional Subjects Samplers ; Exhaust emissions ; Hydrocarbons ; Carbon monoxide ; Nitrogen oxides ; Carbon dioxide ; Design criteria ; Performance evaluation ; Air pollution ; Concentration(Composition) ; Air pollution detection ; Automobile exhaust ; Light duty vehicles ; Proportional samplers
Internet Access
Description Access URL
https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=910178J9.PDF
Holdings
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
Modified
Checkout
Status
EJBD  EPA 600-2-77-236 c.1 Headquarters Library/Washington,DC 04/08/2014
ELBD ARCHIVE EPA 600-2-77-236 Received from HQ AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 10/04/2023
ELBD RPS EPA 600-2-77-236 repository copy AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH 10/17/2014
ESAD  EPA 600-2-77-236 Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA 03/23/2010
NTIS  PB-278 186 Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. 07/26/2022
Collation ii, 25 p. : ill. ; 28 cm.
Abstract
A test program was conducted to evaluate a proportional sampler for use in automotive exhaust gas emissions research. Automobile emissions test results obtained using the proportional sampler were compared with results obtained using the conventional constant volume sampler. Measurements obtained using the proportional sampler for hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and carbon dioxide are within 19, 46, 20, and 14 percent, respectively, of measurements obtained using the constant volume sampler. Such differences render the proportional sampler unacceptable as a quantitative research tool. Inability of the exhaust gas flow meter to accurately measure pulsating exhaust flow is cited as the principal cause of error in the proportional sampler.
Notes
"December 1977." "EPA-600/2-77-236." Also distributed by National Technical Information Service (NTIS) as PB278186.