| Main Title |
Evaluation of rural air quality simulation models : addendum C : Kincaid SO2 data base / |
| Author |
Cox, William M. ;
Rorex, H. W. ;
Moss, G. K.
|
| Other Authors |
|
| CORP Author |
United States. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of AirQuality Planning and Standards. |
| Publisher |
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, |
| Year Published |
1986 |
| Report Number |
EPA-450/4-83-003c; EPA/450/4-83/003C |
| Stock Number |
PB86-242757 |
| OCLC Number |
15250456 |
| Additional Subjects |
Air quality--Illinois ;
Electric power plants ;
Air pollution ;
Mathematical models ;
Evaluation ;
Rural areas ;
Sulfur dioxide ;
Statistical data ;
Air quality
|
| Internet Access |
|
| Holdings |
| Library |
Call Number |
Additional Info |
Location |
Last
Modified |
Checkout
Status |
| EKBD |
EPA-450/4-83-003c |
|
Research Triangle Park Library/RTP, NC |
08/27/1999 |
| ELBD ARCHIVE |
EPA 450-4-83-003c |
Received from HQ |
AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH |
10/04/2023 |
| ELBD |
EPA 450-4-83-003c |
|
AWBERC Library/Cincinnati,OH |
08/27/1999 |
| ESAD |
EPA 450-4-83-003C |
|
Region 10 Library/Seattle,WA |
03/23/2010 |
| NTIS |
PB86-242757 |
Some EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. |
|
07/26/2022 |
|
| Collation |
1 v. (various pagings) : ill. ; 28 cm. |
| Abstract |
The addendum provides additional information regarding the performance of four rural air quality simulation models using SO2 air quality and a modelers data base assembled for the Kincaid Power Plant. The report contains numerous tabulations of each model's performance in terms of statistical measures recommended by the AMS. The four models evaluated included MPTER (EPA), PPSP (Martin Marietta Corp), MPSDM (ERT) and TEM-8A (Texas Air Control Board). Results from this evaluation were similar in many ways to those obtained from Clifty Creek and Muskingum River. PPSP clearly over-predicted concentrations in almost every data category while MPSDM, MPTER, and TEM exhibited relatively small but detectable biases depending on averaging period and data category. |
| Notes |
Distributed to depository libraries in microfiche. "March 1986." Chiefly tables. Bibliography: p. 31. |
