Record Display for the EPA National Library Catalog


OLS Field Name OLS Field Data
Main Title Comparisons of boating and wading methods used to assess the status of flowing waters /
Author Flotemersch, Joseph E. ; Cormier, S. M.
Other Authors
Author Title of a Work
Cormier, Susan M.
Autrey, Bradley C.
CORP Author Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH. National Exposure Research Lab.
Publisher U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Exposure Research Laboratory,
Year Published 2001
Report Number EPA/600/R-00/108
Stock Number PB2001-102899
Additional Subjects Water chemistry ; Boating ; Wading ; Comparisons ; Habitats ; Assessment methods ; Biological methods ; Physical methods ; Chemical methods ; Status ; Stream biomonitoring ; Flowing waters
Internet Access
Description Access URL
Library Call Number Additional Info Location Last
NTIS  PB2001-102899 Most EPA libraries have a fiche copy filed under the call number shown. Check with individual libraries about paper copy. 01/01/1988
Collation 146 pages ; 28 cm
This document has been designed to provide an overview of the biological, physical and chemical methods of selected stream biomonitoring and assessment programs. It was written to satisfy the need to identify current methods that exist for sampling large rivers. The primary focus of this document is the boating methods used to assess flowing waters, but both boat based and wading methods are included. The target audiences are individuals tasked: to work with data generated from one or more of these programs; to design or improve a bioassess- and monitoring program; to conduct field work using methods (or based on methods) reviewed in this text; to conduct field comparisons among these methods to determine the extent of their comparability and when each method is best employed. This document is useful to these individuals in that it brings together relatively obscure literature from a wide variety of sources and it presents current and developing methods in a comprehensive context. These features allow this document to serve as a guide for comparing the methods used by various agencies for assessing large rivers.
"April 2001." Microfiche.