Grantee Research Project Results

Longitudinal evaluation of a household energy package on blood pressure, central hemodynamics, and arterial stiffness in China

Citation:

Clark S, Schmidt A, Carter E, Schauer J, Yang X, Ezzati M, Daskalopoulou S, Baumgartner J. Longitudinal evaluation of a household energy package on blood pressure, central hemodynamics, and arterial stiffness in China. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2019;177(108592).

Abstract:

Background: Cardiovascular diseases are the leading contributors to disease burden in China and globally, and household air pollution exposure is associated with risk of cardiovascular disease. Objectives: We evaluated whether subclinical cardiovascular outcomes in adult Chinese women would improve after distribution of an energy package comprised of a semi-gasifier cookstove, water heater, chimney, and supply of processed biomass fuel. Methods: We enrolled 204 households (n = 205 women) from 12 villages into a controlled before- and after-intervention study on cardiovascular health and air pollution in Sichuan Province. The intervention was distributed to 124 households during a government-sponsored rural energy demonstration program. The remaining 80 households received the package 18 months later at the end of the study, forming a comparison group. One woman from each household had their blood pressure (BP), central hemodynamics, and arterial stiffness measured along with exposures to air pollution and demographic and household characteristics, on up to five visits. We used a difference-in-differences mixed-effects regression approach with Bayesian inference to assess the impact of the energy package on sub-clinical cardiovascular outcomes. Results: Women who did not receive the energy package had greater mean decreases in brachial systolic (-4.1 mmHg, 95% credible interval (95%CIe) -7.3, -0.9) and diastolic BP (-2.0 mmHg, 95%CIe -3.6, -0.5) compared with women who received the package (systolic: -2.7, 95%CIe -5.0, -0.4; diastolic: -0.3, 95%CIe -1.4, 0.8) resulting in slightly positive but not statistically significant difference-in-differences effect estimates of 1.3 mmHg (95%CIe -2.5, 5.2) and 1.7 mmHg (95%CIe -0.3, 3.6), respectively. Similar trends were found for central BP, central pulse pressure, and arterial stiffness. Air pollution exposures decreased on average for both treatment groups, with a greater range of reductions among women who did not receive the package (with package: -30% to -50%; without package: +2% to -69%), likely as a result of increased use of gas fuel and electric stoves among this group. Outdoor air quality changed very little over time. Conclusions: Gasifier stoves have been widely promoted as the next generation of 'clean-cooking' technologies, however their effectiveness in improving health in real-world settings should be carefully evaluated and communicated before scaling up their implementation.