Grantee Research Project Results
Ozone and survival in four cohorts with potentially predisposing diseases.
Citation:
Zanobetti A, Schwartz J. Ozone and survival in four cohorts with potentially predisposing diseases. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine 2011;184(7):836-841.
Abstract:
RATIONALE: Time series studies have reported associations between ozone and daily deaths. Only one cohort study has reported the effect of long-term exposures on deaths, and little is known about effects of chronic ozone exposure on survival in susceptible populations. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether ozone was associated with survival in four cohorts of persons with specific diseases in 105 US cities, treating ozone as a time varying exposure. METHODS: We used Medicare data (1985-2006), and constructed cohorts of persons hospitalized with chronic conditions that might predispose to ozone effects: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, congestive heart failure, and myocardial infarction. Yearly warm-season average ozone was merged to the individual follow up in each city. We applied Cox proportional hazard model for each cohort within each city, adjusting for individual risk factors, temperature and city specific long term trends. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We found significant associations with a hazard ratio for mortality of 1.06 (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 1.03-1.08) per 5-ppb increase in summer average ozone for persons with congestive heart failure; of 1.09 (95% CI, 1.06- .12) with myocardial infarction; of 1.07 (95% CI, 1.04-1.09) with COPD, and of 1.07 (95% CI: 1.05-1.10) for diabetics. We also found that the effect varied by region, but that this was mostly explained by mean temperature, which is likely a surrogate of air conditioning use, and hence exposure. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study that follows persons with specific chronic conditions, and shows that long-term ozone exposure is associated with increased risk of death in these groups.The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.