Grantee Research Project Results
Coagulation markers in healthy human subjects exposed to diesel exhaust.
Citation:
Carlsten C, Kaufman JD, Peretz A, Trenga CA, Sheppard L, Sullivan JH. Coagulation markers in healthy human subjects exposed to diesel exhaust. Thrombosis Research 2007;120(6):849-855.
Abstract:
BACKGROUND: Ambient particulate matter (PM) is associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. It has been proposed that PM induces a pro-thrombotic process, increasing the risk of cardiovascular events, with some support from epidemiological and laboratory-based models. Diesel exhaust is a major contributor to urban PM, and we conducted a controlled human exposure of diesel exhaust in healthy subjects. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate diesel exhaust exposure effects on fibrinolytic burden (D-dimer), platelet number, and endothelial injury (von Willebrand's factor, VWF), inhibition of the fibrinolytic pathway (plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 [PAI-1]), and inflammation (C-reactive protein, CRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Randomized, crossover, double-blinded design, with 13 healthy participants exposed on three different days (>or=2 weeks washout) to diesel exhaust at 0 (filtered air), 100 microg PM(2.5)/m(3) and 200 microg PM(2.5)/m(3). We assessed diesel exhaust-associated changes in D-dimer, VWF, PAI-1 and platelets at 3, 6 and 22 h, and CRP at 22 h, after exposure initiation. RESULT: Significant changes did not occur in any primary endpoints. Among secondary endpoints, diesel exhaust (200 microg PM(2.5)/m(3)) effect on PAI-1 levels at 22 h was of borderline significance, with a 1.32-fold decrease after exposure to diesel exhaust (200 microg PM(2.5)/m(3)), relative to filtered air (CI 1.00 to 1.54). Diurnal patterns in D-dimer and PAI-1 were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy individuals, exposure to 200 microg PM(2.5)/m(3) diesel exhaust did not affect primary pro-thrombotic endpoints. Thus, these data do not support a diesel exhaust-induced pro-thrombotic phenomenon. Replication of these studies should be carried out to ascertain whether or not they inform our mechanistic understanding of air pollution's cardiovascular effects.The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.