Grantee Research Project Results
Final Report: Evaluation of the 100% Recyclability of Superpave Hot Mix Asphalt
EPA Contract Number: EPD11056Title: Evaluation of the 100% Recyclability of Superpave Hot Mix Asphalt
Investigators: Ali, Hesham
Small Business: H.I.P. Hot-In-Place Paving LLC
EPA Contact: Richards, April
Phase: I
Project Period: March 1, 2011 through August 31, 2011
Project Amount: $80,000
RFA: Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) - Phase I (2011) RFA Text | Recipients Lists
Research Category: Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) , SBIR - Green Buildings
Description:
At 2.7 million miles of paved roads, the United States has the largest network of roads in the world. The mainstream approach to pavement rehabilitation has been to mill the deteriorated asphalt and replace with new asphalt mix. The hot-in-place pavement recycling process has the potential of replacing the milling and resurfacing process with substantial financial and environmental savings. Hot-in-place pavement recycling restores the pavement to its original condition. The process was improved and refined over the past several years to produce the following outstanding benefits:
- About 50% cost savings over the conventional milling and resurfacing, as indicated in FDOT’s published report on SR 471 HIP recycled pavement. This is valued at $18 billion savings a year for the United States.
- Eliminates 90% of the emissions resulting from pavement milling and resurfacing process.
- Eliminates the growing piles of asphalt millings that threaten to pollute water.
- Eliminates the need to haul materials from the plant to the road and haul asphalt millings from the road to the plant. This reduces traffic at construction sites and resulting pollution.
- Eliminates the need to mine new materials – an energy-intense operation that involves explosives.
- Significantly cuts the needs for new Asphalt Cement and reduces reliance on foreign oil. Approximately saves 15 million tons of asphalt cement, valued at $8 billion a year.
- Test results of recycled mix showed that the recycled asphalt had more than double the required stability – excellent indication of strength and durability.
- Reduces down-time of pavements being restored.
In 2004, the Florida Department of Transportation evaluated the hot-in-place pavement recycling and performed a side-by-side comparison with conventional milling and resurfacing. FDOT concluded that the process was a viable option, but expressed concern that the process may not yield a Superpave equivalent mix and suggested a further evaluation. This proposal develops an experimental design of three factors (nominal mix size, aggregate type and mix function) and conducts laboratory tests to evaluate the hypothesis that a deteriorated Superpave mix can be successfully recycled to meet a long-term performance similar to that of the virgin Superpave mix. DOTs started using Superpave mixes in the late ‘90s. Many of those roads are now eligible for resurfacing. If the evaluation is successful, it would allow DOTs to proceed with trying the process on Superpave mixes.
Summary/Accomplishments (Outputs/Outcomes):
The experiment conducted in this study was aimed at evaluating a variety of old Superpave mixes for 100 percent hot in-place recycling. To that end, four mixes were obtained, and the in-place properties of the mixes were determined. The optimum amount of Rejuvenator and screenings were determined. The volumetric analysis was performed to ensure compliance with Superpave requirements. The four mixes then were tested and evaluated for rutting, moisture damage, and cracking performance. A life-cycle cost analysis and emissions analysis were performed to evaluate the monetary and environmental savings of hot in-place recycling. The results of the study are summarized below.
Implications
The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.