Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Community and Conservation in California

EPA Grant Number: R825226
Title: Community and Conservation in California
Investigators: Press, Daniel
Institution: University of California - Santa Cruz
EPA Project Officer: Hahn, Intaek
Project Period: November 15, 1996 through November 14, 2001
Project Amount: $304,782
RFA: Exploratory Research - Early Career Awards (1996) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Early Career Awards

Description:

This project will focus on variations in open-space preservation in California at and below the county level (the dependent variable). Data collected on local open-space preservation demonstrate that locally-led open-space preservation varies widely, from zero acres per thousand county residents to over 200 acres per thousand county residents. Most readily available socioeconomic, political, and demographic indicators are, separately or together, weak predictors of protected acreage.

The central hypothesis of this project is that local social capital strongly affects land conservation outcomes. Using both qualitative (archival and in-depth interview) and quantitative (county resident phone surveys, ballot initiative returns) data, 30 counties will be characterized by their relative degrees of social capital and place attachment. Project hypotheses are:

(1) Counties that are currently most active at protecting local open space also exhibit high levels of social capital among their residents, relative to other counties.

(2) Counties that are currently most active at protecting local open space were also more active in the past, and exhibited high levels of past social capital among their residents, relative to other counties.

(3) Counties that are currently most active at protecting local open space also exhibit high levels of place attachment among their residents, relative to other counties.

Data on social capital will be collected cross-sectionally and longitudinally (1950-1996). Data on place attachment will only be collected cross-sectionally, but will provide a baseline for future, longitudinal studies of place attachment and policy outcomes.

The project will make both academic and policy contributions useful to park managers, legislators, and open space advocates. Academic contributions will include empirically-based insights on the role social capital can play in environmental policy. In the realm of public policy, the results will also contribute to ongoing environmental protection strategies as well as legislative debates concerning local support for new open space districts.

Publications and Presentations:

Publications have been submitted on this project: View all 3 publications for this project

Journal Articles:

Journal Articles have been submitted on this project: View all 1 journal articles for this project

Supplemental Keywords:

survey, socioeconomics., RFA, Scientific Discipline, Economic, Social, & Behavioral Science Research Program, Geographic Area, State, Ecology and Ecosystems, decision-making, Social Science, Economics & Decision Making, demographic, ecosystem valuation, policy analysis, public resources, social psychology, community involvement, decision analysis, decision making, environmental assets, conservation, environmental values, socioeconomics, changing environmental conditions, community-based, public policy, California (CA), land use, longitudinal dataset

Progress and Final Reports:

  • 1997 Progress Report
  • 1998
  • 1999 Progress Report
  • 2000
  • Final
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final
    • 2000
    • 1999 Progress Report
    • 1998
    • 1997 Progress Report
    3 publications for this project
    1 journal articles for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.