Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Direct and Indirect Effects of Logging in Headwater Streams: The Role of Patch Dynamics in Structuring Aquatic Invertebrate Communities

EPA Grant Number: F6E11020
Title: Direct and Indirect Effects of Logging in Headwater Streams: The Role of Patch Dynamics in Structuring Aquatic Invertebrate Communities
Investigators: Griswold, Marcus
Institution: University of Florida
EPA Project Officer: Packard, Benjamin H
Project Period: August 21, 2006 through August 11, 2008
Project Amount: $111,172
RFA: STAR Graduate Fellowships (2006) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Academic Fellowships , Fellowship - Aquatic Ecology and Ecosystems

Objective:

Fragmentation and habitat loss in watersheds due to logging practices alters organic matter input and allows for the growth of macrophytes and algae in streams, creating patchy landscapes in aquatic systems. The overall objective is to quantify the response of stream macroinvertebrates (abundance and composition) to changes in autochthonous (macrophytes) and allochthonous (leaf litter) sources under two forestry management regimes: intact buffer zone and 50% removal of the buffer zone. Within this objective, I plan to address the following questions:

  1. How does macroinvertebrate species composition and abundance change with patch type, size and quality?
  2. How do spatial and temporal changes (e.g. stability) in leaf pack formation and macrophyte growth alter invertebrate community structure and colonization patterns?
  3. How does habitat availability and type alter invertebrate movement patterns? This question will focus specifically on (1) how patch type and amount affect habitat selection, and (2) whether matrix quality enhances connectivity between patches.

Approach:

Field experiments will be utilized to examine the relationship between patch type, size, and stability on macroinvertebrate community structure. Initially the relationship between resource availability and macroinvertebrate species composition will be examined in four experimental watersheds. Instream manipulations of patches will be utilized to examine colonization patterns and movement ability between patch types in an effort to model movement patterns between patches.

Expected Results:

The results of this research will provide valuable information to forestry and watershed management officials; allowing for refinement of regulations concerning the minimum amount of forest cover that must be maintained near streams in order to preserve aquatic invertebrate community structure. In addition, results from movement studies will be used to predict the amount of each patch type needed to allow sensitive macroinvertebrates to exist.

Supplemental Keywords:

Patch dynamics, logging, headwater streams, behavior, coastal plain, riparian, Environmental Monitoring, Ecosystems, Ecosystem Protection/Environmental Exposure & Risk, Aquatic Ecosystem,, RFA, Scientific Discipline, Water, Water & Watershed, Environmental Monitoring, Ecology and Ecosystems, Watersheds, landscape change, nitrogen loading, wood debris, urbanization, logging, stream ecosystems, nitrogen inputs, stream macroinvertibrates, aquatic ecosystems, water quality, forested watershed, watershed assessment, patch dynamics, groundwater, land use

Progress and Final Reports:

  • 2007
  • Final
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.