Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Spatial Arrangement of Urban Development: Impacts on Nonpoint Source Pollution

EPA Grant Number: F6C20122
Title: Spatial Arrangement of Urban Development: Impacts on Nonpoint Source Pollution
Investigators: Lipscomb, Monica Renee
Institution: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
EPA Project Officer: Lee, Sonja
Project Period: September 1, 2006 through September 1, 2009
Project Amount: $111,172
RFA: STAR Graduate Fellowships (2006) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Academic Fellowships , Fellowship - Geography , Watersheds , Ecological Indicators/Assessment/Restoration

Objective:

This study will inform an understanding of how patterns of urban development can be altered to reduce urban flooding and non-point source nutrient pollution. While many scientific studies have described the ecological and hydrological impacts of increased imperviousness, very little has been discerned regarding impacts of location and pattern of development.

I will examine three hypotheses concerning interaction between land cover and spatial patterns of water and pollutant retention:

  1. Preservation of land in the watershed ridgeline area is as essential as buffer preservation to control of stormwater runoff and non-point source pollution than preserving land along the stream buffer;
  2. Clustered residential design, such as new urbanism, will lead to reduced nonpoint source pollution; more traditional residential design, characterized by more dispersed imperviousness, will lead to increases in runoff and nitrate transport;
  3. Preservation of land and stormwater retention strategies in the low stream-order/headwater subcatchments are more critical to prevent runoff and nutrient transport than preservation of land in the high-stream order/mainstem portion of the watershed.

Approach:

To address the hypotheses of this study, this research will incorporate:

  • field measurements,
  • GIS-based ecohydrological modeling,
  • landscape metrics, and
  • remote sensing data analysis.

Using this combination of methods, I will develop a model of how the spatial arrangement of development impacts water flow in urban systems.

Expected Results:

Stormwater and water quality management strategies require better information regarding the interaction between development location, patterns, and density influence hydrological processes. Expected results of this study include:

  • a determination of advantageous location and design of neighborhoods to reduce surface runoff;
  • the development of pattern metrics to pinpoint critical areas within other Mid-Atlantic watersheds;

Upon successful completion of this research, I intend to: complete and defend my dissertation; publish several papers on nitrogen ecohydrology in urban areas; and create a brochure documenting the results of my research to be made available at planning offices within the Chesapeake Bay. While working on this research, I will gain the teaching and research experience necessary to prepare myself to become a successful professor in the environmental sciences.

Supplemental Keywords:

water quality, urbanization, nonpoint source pollution, water runoff, nitrogen pollution, urban hydrology, spatial arrangement, pattern metrics,, RFA, Scientific Discipline, Water, Water & Watershed, Ground Water, Ecology and Ecosystems, Urban and Regional Planning, Watersheds, alternative urbanization scenarios, valuation of watersheds, runoff, urban runoff, conservation, stormwater drainage, GIS, non-point sources, urbanizing watersheds

Progress and Final Reports:

  • 2007
  • 2008
  • Final
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.