Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Transnational Environmental Non-Governmental Organizations: Creating a Theory of Accountability for a New Form of Resource Governance

EPA Grant Number: F6C30865
Title: Transnational Environmental Non-Governmental Organizations: Creating a Theory of Accountability for a New Form of Resource Governance
Investigators: Balboa, Cristina M
Institution: Yale University
EPA Project Officer: Lee, Sonja
Project Period: July 1, 2006 through May 1, 2008
Project Amount: $111,172
RFA: STAR Graduate Fellowships (2006) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Fellowship - Political Science , Academic Fellowships , Environmental Justice

Objective:

Increasing numbers of complex environmental problems have forced developing country governments to turn to the expertise and resources of transnational environmental non-governmental organizations (TENGOs) for environmental policy, thus forcing TENGOs from their traditional advisory role to a new role of policymaker. Often, TENGOs are staffed and funded by the global north to the exclusion of southern, resource-dependent communities. To whom and how are these TENGOs accountable? My research identifies causes for the varying accountability relationships between local communities and TENGOs and evaluates theory on why these relationships differ. This research examines a unique and counter-intuitive scenario where those calling for participatory conservation (well-intending TENGOs) address conservation at the exclusion of local communities. Why?

This research explores a broader accountability question: Why do TENGOs have varying accountability relationships with resource-dependent communities? Two explanatory variables will be evaluated to answer this question: 1) TENGO’s relationships with other network actors; 2) TENGOs organizational structure and decision-making culture.

Approach:

This qualitative, comparative case study research holds the geographically-centered Private Conservation Network as the unit of analysis. Structured and semi-structured interviews, archival research and participant observation will be used in three case studies. Historical process tracing will be used to illustrate the causal relationships between actors through examining the streams of events that connect the antecedents and outcomes.

Expected Results:

This research has practical and academic implications. It will create tested theory for new policy phenomena by connecting three diverse literatures - the policy development, international relations and environmental policy. Once causal relations are established, this work will suggest policy tools and practices to enhance the accountability of Private Conservation Networks and create more participatory and sustainable environmental decision-making.

Supplemental Keywords:

NGO, accountability, resource governance, participation, coastal conservation, community-based conservation, papua new guinea, philippines, palau, conservation networks, organization theory, political science, public policy, policy networks, nonprofit organizations, environmental policy, environmental governance, private governance, authority,, RFA, Scientific Discipline, ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, Economic, Social, & Behavioral Science Research Program, Economics & Decision Making, decision-making, Social Science, Ecology and Ecosystems, Resources Management, trans-jurisdictional problems, environmental decision making, changing environmental conditions, collaborative decision making, Transnational Environmental NGO, community based environmental planning, conservation, decision making, environmental policy, environmental protection

Progress and Final Reports:

  • 2007
  • Final
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.