Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Wildfire Risk Reduction: Homeowners and Decision-Making in the Wildland Urban Interface

EPA Grant Number: F5B30517
Title: Wildfire Risk Reduction: Homeowners and Decision-Making in the Wildland Urban Interface
Investigators: Brenkert, Hannah
Institution: University of Colorado at Boulder
EPA Project Officer: Hahn, Intaek
Project Period: September 1, 2005 through April 1, 2008
Project Amount: $111,000
RFA: STAR Graduate Fellowships (2005) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Academic Fellowships

Objective:

The primary goal of this research is to develop a better understanding of the decision-making processes of homeowners in wildfire prone areas regarding the adoption of wildfire mitigation strategies. To date, social scientific examination of wildfire has primarily focused on exploring public acceptance of forest management approaches, including the use of controlled (or prescribed) burns on public lands. Public land management, however, is only one aspect of fire management in the wildland-urban interface (WUI). This ‘interface’ is growing in size and density and wildfire research lacks a systematic understanding of the relationship between wildfire risk and the decisions homeowners make regarding risk reduction strategies on their land.

This research will focus on two categories of factors that may play a role in homeowners’ willingness to adopt wildfire mitigation strategies. First, I will explore social factors, such as community attachment and social ties, often associated with the adoption of natural hazard risk reduction strategies. Second, I will explore the environmental dimensions of social factors, including attachment to, and meanings associated with, biophysical conditions such forest conditions and landscape that may shape the willingness of homeowners to adopt risk reduction strategies.

Approach:

Research objectives will be pursued through the use of quantitative and qualitative methods. Survey data from a representative sample of residents in the wildland-urban interface of the Front Range of three Colorado counties will provide baseline data regarding type and frequency of wildfire mitigation practices. In-depth interviews with residents in the same areas will be used to explore the ways in which community attachment and place attachment shape wildfire mitigation decisions.

Expected Results:

This research will provide insight into the applicability of social science findings regarding mitigation in the natural hazards literature to household mitigation decisions in wildfire prone contexts. It will also explore the ways in which social relationships and the relationships homeowners have with their homes, properties, and landscapes play a role in the complex decision-making processes seeking to balance risk reduction with the maintenance of preferred meaningful aesthetic landscapes.

Supplemental Keywords:

Natural hazards, environmental decision-making, risk management and response, mitigation, wildfire, wildland-urban interface, American west, forest management, place attachment, community attachment,, RFA, Scientific Discipline, POLLUTION PREVENTION, Economic, Social, & Behavioral Science Research Program, Economics & Decision Making, Ecological Risk Assessment, decision-making, sustainable development, Social Science, Ecology and Ecosystems, household choice, wildfire risk reduction, environmental decision making, community involvement, anthropogenic effects, decision analysis, land use, forest reources, collaborative decision making, decision making, environmental risk assessment, community based environmental planning

Progress and Final Reports:

  • 2006
  • 2007
  • Final
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.