Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

The Political Ecology of Sustainable Agriculture in China: National Goals and Farmer Realities

EPA Grant Number: U915611
Title: The Political Ecology of Sustainable Agriculture in China: National Goals and Farmer Realities
Investigators: Thomas, Brian J.
Institution: University of Oregon
EPA Project Officer: Hahn, Intaek
Project Period: September 1, 1999 through June 1, 2001
Project Amount: $67,905
RFA: STAR Graduate Fellowships (1999) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Academic Fellowships , Environmental Justice , Fellowship - Environmental

Objective:

The objectives of this research project are to: (1) ascertain whether Chinese Ecological Agriculture (CEA) provides a meaningful, theoretical basis for sustainable agriculture; and (2) determine the potential of CEA to facilitate the construction of a sustainable agricultural system in rural China. A comprehensive evaluation of the social, economic, and environmental forces influencing development in rural China is necessary not only to understand whether CEA is a system worth implementing, but also if CEA can be implemented on a widespread basis.

Approach:

CEA is not simply a set of agricultural practices or a single system of production; it is a system that can be adapted to diverse regional conditions. It is important to quantify the environmental, economic, and social impacts of individual CEA systems; however, to determine the potential of CEA as a model for sustainability, it is essential to first evaluate the theoretical basis on which individual systems are constructed. My evaluation of the theoretical basis of CEA is based on a review of the literature. Criteria for the evaluation of sustainability are based on a systems perspective of the material and energy requirements of CEA compared to conventional agricultural systems. During the summer of 2000, I visited the Soil Science Research Institute in Nanjing and the Red Soil Ecological Research Station in Yingtan, Jiangxi, both located in eastern China. I collected information regarding the theoretical basis and the practical application of CEA through semistructured interviews with government officials and researchers. As a participant in the training course Biotechnologies for Sustainable Agricultural Development, I collected information on the construction of CEA systems in the Zhejiang Province. This course was conducted by the Ecoagriculture Institute at Zhejiang University, and focused on the use of Chinese ecological agriculture and intensive farming systems. This training course involved lectures, field visits to CEA sites, and visits with government personnel involved in CEA system management.

Supplemental Keywords:

fellowship, China, agriculture, sustainable development, rural development, socioeconomic, ecological agriculture, Zhejiang, organic agriculture., RFA, Scientific Discipline, INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION, Geographic Area, Economic, Social, & Behavioral Science Research Program, Economics & Decision Making, International, Economics, Country & Regional Programs, decision-making, Social Science, Ecology and Ecosystems, political ecology, socioeconomics, Chinese Ecological Agriculture, environmental decision making, sustainable development, China, agriculture, sustainable agriculture

Progress and Final Reports:

  • 2000
  • Final
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.