Grantee Research Project Results
2000 Progress Report: Development of Chemical Methods to Assess the Bioavailability of Arsenic in Contaminated Media
EPA Grant Number: R825410Title: Development of Chemical Methods to Assess the Bioavailability of Arsenic in Contaminated Media
Investigators: Basta, Nicholas T. , Rodriguez, Robin R. , Casteel, Stan W.
Institution: Oklahoma State University , University of Missouri - Columbia
EPA Project Officer: Hahn, Intaek
Project Period: November 1, 1996 through October 31, 1999 (Extended to October 31, 2000)
Project Period Covered by this Report: November 1, 1999 through October 31, 2000
Project Amount: $431,677
RFA: Environmental Fate and Treatment of Toxics and Hazardous Wastes (1996) RFA Text | Recipients Lists
Research Category: Hazardous Waste/Remediation , Land and Waste Management , Safer Chemicals
Objective:
Soil ingestion from incidental hand-to-mouth activity by children is an important issue in assessing public health risks associated with exposure to arsenic-contaminated soils and media. Use of the swine model for bioavailability determinations has been thoroughly validated for lead and arsenic-contaminated materials. Several disadvantages using animal models to measure contaminant bioavailability include expense, specialized facilities, and personnel. Chemical methods (chemical fractionation, in vitro gastrointestinal) that provide a reasonable estimate of the bioavailable arsenic in contaminated media may provide rapid and inexpensive information needed to characterize risk at Superfund sites.The objectives of this research project are to provide answers to the following questions:
1. Can chemical fractionation and in vitro gastrointestinal (IVG) laboratory methods provide accurate assessments of bioavailable arsenic in contaminated media?
2. Can an IVG method that simulates gastrointestinal (GI) absorption provide a more accurate estimate of arsenic bioavailability than an IVG method that does not simulate GI absorption?
3. Is arsenic bioavailability a function of arsenic concentration where soil may serve as a sink and decrease arsenic bioavailability? To answer these questions, arsenic measured by chemical methods (chemical fractionation and in vitro gastrointestinal methods) are compared with arsenic uptake by immature pigs for contaminated media (soil and slag) collected from smelter sites.
Progress Summary:
A 1-year, no-cost extension was requested and the extension was granted by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Most activity conducted during the reporting period involved completing "loose ends." Immature urine samples were reanalyzed by a recently Standard Operating Procedure produced by Dr. Casteel. Some soil extractions were repeated to confirm previous results or replace suspect results. New data were used to perform calculations and statistical analysis required to evaluate Objectives 1 and 3.Future Activities:
The grant has been completed. The only future activity will be the preparation and submission of the final grant report.Journal Articles:
No journal articles submitted with this report: View all 20 publications for this projectSupplemental Keywords:
soil, sediments, absorption, exposure, risk, risk assessment, human health, bioavailability, dose-response, carcinogen, children, chemicals, toxics, heavy metals, remediation, cleanup, environmental chemistry, biology, analytical, measurement methods, cleanup levels, remediation endpoints, site-specific bioavailability, oral bioavailability, health effects., RFA, Health, Scientific Discipline, Waste, Water, Ecosystem Protection/Environmental Exposure & Risk, Bioavailability, Contaminated Sediments, Environmental Chemistry, Chemistry, Epidemiology, Arsenic, Risk Assessments, Fate & Transport, Susceptibility/Sensitive Population/Genetic Susceptibility, Children's Health, genetic susceptability, fate and transport, health effects, risk assessment, fate, contaminated mines, ingestion, soil ingestion, Superfund sites, contaminant transport, risk characterization, soil sediment, human health effects, contaminated sediment, dermal contact, sediment transport, transport contaminants, chemical speciation, adverse human health affects, chemical contaminants, kinetic studies, soils, hazardous waste, children, toxicity, human exposure, superfund site, chronic health effects, environmental toxicant, mobility, arsenic mobility, animal research, ecology assessment models, arsenic exposure, hazardous waste sites, exposure assessmentRelevant Websites:
http://www.agr.okstate.edu/soilchem
Progress and Final Reports:
Original AbstractThe perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.