Grantee Research Project Results
Evaluation of Microbial Reductive Dechlorination in Treated Source Zones
EPA Grant Number: U916150Title: Evaluation of Microbial Reductive Dechlorination in Treated Source Zones
Investigators: Amos, Benjamin K.
Institution: Georgia Institute of Technology
EPA Project Officer: Packard, Benjamin H
Project Period: January 1, 2003 through January 1, 2006
Project Amount: $139,878
RFA: STAR Graduate Fellowships (2003) Recipients Lists
Research Category: Fellowship - Environmental , Academic Fellowships , Safer Chemicals
Objective:
The overall objective of this research project is to explore the microbial reductive dechlorination process as a viable polishing step for the removal of residual dense nonaqueous phase liquids (DNAPLs) after the initial physical-chemical treatment. Chlorinated solvents are major groundwater contaminants and are of particular concern because they form DNAPLs, which are long-term, continuous sources of contamination. Removal of source zones is critical before lasting treatment of the dissolved contaminants in the plume can be achieved. Considerable research has focused on the development and demonstration of physical-chemical technologies (e.g., surfactant flushing) for DNAPL mass recovery from contaminated source zones. Although promising, no approach removes 100 percent of the source zone contaminant mass, resulting in continued and persistent contaminant elution and plume formation after treatment. The specific objective of this research project is to determinate dechlorination rates and product formation patterns under saturated conditions and in the presence of free-phase perchloroethylene using pure and mixed bacterial cultures.
Approach:
After the initial screening, the most promising cultures will be tested to promote complete contaminant removal in one-dimensional aquifer columns following physical-chemical treatment. Two-dimensional aquifer flow cells will be constructed to further evaluate the feasibility of the sequential approach for source zone remediation. Culture-independent molecular approaches will be used to monitor the distribution of the key populations in the aquifer columns and flow cells. The research outlined above is relevant because it will provide convincing evidence to the remediation community that microbial reductive dechlorination is a suitable posttreatment strategy for the removal of residual DNAPL from contaminated source zones.
The results of this research project could increase the effectiveness of current remediation strategies by combining both physical and biological remediation technologies, aiding in the evaluation, reduction, and management of risk at chloroethene-contaminated sites, and reducing the remediation cost.
Supplemental Keywords:
fellowship, dechlorination, groundwater, contaminants, dense nonaqueous phase liquids, DNAPLs, contamination, source zones, microbial reductive dechlorination, chlorinated solvents, remediation, source removal., RFA, Scientific Discipline, INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION, Waste, Water, TREATMENT/CONTROL, Ecosystem Protection/Environmental Exposure & Risk, Chemical Engineering, Remediation, Environmental Chemistry, Treatment Technologies, Restoration, Technology, Hazardous Waste, Bioremediation, Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration, Groundwater remediation, Hazardous, Engineering, Chemistry, & Physics, Environmental Engineering, reductive dehalogenation, hazardous waste treatment, dechlorination, microbiology, monitoring, redox tools, DNAPL, in situ remediation, microbial degradation, in situ treatment, advanced treatment technologies, bioremediation model, biodegradation, dehalogenate, aquifer remediation design, dehalogenation, in-situ bioremediation, biotechnology, groundwater contamination, contaminated groundwater, aquatic ecosystems, reductive dechlorination, contaminated aquifers, bioaugmentation, groundwater, aquifer remediation, in-situ biotransformationRelevant Websites:
2004 STAR Graduate Fellowship Conference Poster (PDF, 1p., 1.1MB, about PDF)
Progress and Final Reports:
The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.