Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Development of Advanced Factor Analysis Methods for Carbonaceous PM Source Identification and Apportionment

EPA Grant Number: R831078
Title: Development of Advanced Factor Analysis Methods for Carbonaceous PM Source Identification and Apportionment
Investigators: Hopke, Philip K. , Henry, Ronald C. , Spiegelman, C. , Paatero, P.
Institution: Clarkson University
Current Institution: Clarkson University , Texas A & M University , University of Helsinki , University of Southern California
EPA Project Officer: Chung, Serena
Project Period: October 1, 2003 through September 30, 2006 (Extended to December 31, 2006)
Project Amount: $450,000
RFA: Measurement, Modeling, and Analysis Methods for Airborne Carbonaceous Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) (2003) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Particulate Matter , Air Quality and Air Toxics , Air

Objective:

Because controls on precursor gases have reduced sulfate and nitrate formation, carbonaceous particles are becoming a larger fraction of the fine particle mass. Accurate source identification and apportionment will be important for developing effective control strategies for areas found to be out of attainment of the PM2.5 standard. In addition, there is increasing interest in epidemiological studies to relate adverse health effects to apportioned source contributions. Thus, the objective of this project is to combine the best features of the two advanced factor analysis models, UNMIX and Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF), and to test the effectiveness of this improved factor analysis methodology by analysis of the data developed at the various supersites with an emphasis on data from the New York City supersite and other data from New York State.

Approach:

PMF provides an optimized explicit least squares framework on which to build models. As such it provides for individual data point weights to provide optimum scaling. UNMIX includes an edge-finding routine to define relative elemental concentrations in the source profiles as well as a bootstrapping approach for estimating uncertainties in the resulting source profiles and contributions. By working together, we can combine these approaches into an improved factor analysis approach. One effort will be developing models that can make maximal use of data collected on different time scales (i.e., hourly data from semicontinuous systems and 24-hour integrated filter samples). Particularly with the carbonaceous aerosol where there are important diurnal and weekday/weekend patterns of mobile source traffic, averaging the hourly OC/EC values loses much of the information content of the data. Thus, new data analysis approaches that can fully utilize the data from instruments operating on different time scales are critical to extracting maximal information from the data. Appropriate models will be developed and tested. The rotational ambiguity in the PMF results will be reduced by including the edge information into the analysis. An error analysis that combines the residual rotational ambiguity with the measurement uncertainties for a better estimate of the overall uncertainties in the results. These methods will be exercised using supersite data with an emphasis on the New York City data, but taking advantage of all of the available data.

Expected Results:

This project will provide substantially improved factor analysis methodology. In addition the increased time resolution of new analytical methods being employed in the supersite program will provide data that is better suited for factor analysis. Thus, we expect to provide a substantially improved data analysis approach that will be able to take full advantage of the information content of any data set.

Publications and Presentations:

Publications have been submitted on this project: View all 37 publications for this project

Journal Articles:

Journal Articles have been submitted on this project: View all 21 journal articles for this project

Supplemental Keywords:

PM2.5, source apportionment, multivariate receptor model, positive matrix factorization, UNMIX, carbonaceous particle, gasoline vehicle, diesel emissions, source profiles, source contributions, organic carbon, elemental carbon, supersite data analysis, RFA, Air, Ecosystem Protection/Environmental Exposure & Risk, Scientific Discipline, particulate matter, Air Quality, Environmental Chemistry, Engineering, Chemistry, & Physics, Monitoring/Modeling, Air Pollution Effects, air toxics, Environmental Engineering, Environmental Monitoring, aerosol particles, health effects, diesel exhaust, atmospheric dispersion models, particle size, air sampling, mass spectrometry, carbon particles, emissions, chemical characteristics, air quality modeling, measurement methods, aersol particles, airborne particulate matter, emissions monitoring, advanced factor analysis models, motor vehicle emissions, atmospheric particles, modeling studies, environmental measurement, mobile sources, particulate matter mass, air quality model, thermal desorption, particulate organic carbon, carbon aerosols, aerosol analyzers, air quality models, atmospheric particulate matter, ultrafine particulate matter, chemical speciation sampling, particle size measurement, atmospheric measurements, positive matrix factorization, PM 2.5, carbonaceous particulate matter, model-based analysis

Progress and Final Reports:

  • 2004 Progress Report
  • 2005 Progress Report
  • 2006
  • Final Report
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final Report
    • 2006
    • 2005 Progress Report
    • 2004 Progress Report
    37 publications for this project
    21 journal articles for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.