Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Final Report: Evaluation and Minimization of Organic Aerosol Sampling Artifacts Using Impactors and Quartz Fiber Filter Denuders

EPA Grant Number: R831087
Title: Evaluation and Minimization of Organic Aerosol Sampling Artifacts Using Impactors and Quartz Fiber Filter Denuders
Investigators: Fitz, Dennis R.
Institution: University of California - Riverside
EPA Project Officer: Chung, Serena
Project Period: October 1, 2003 through October 31, 2007
Project Amount: $187,030
RFA: Measurement, Modeling, and Analysis Methods for Airborne Carbonaceous Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) (2003) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Particulate Matter , Air Quality and Air Toxics , Air

Objective:

Particulate matter (PM) differs from other criteria pollutants in that it consists of a complex chemical mixture. Particulate organic carbon (POC) is a major contributor to PM and consists of thousands of individual compounds covering a full range of chemical and physical characteristics. Many POC constituents are found in significant fractions in both the gas and particulate phases. The amount in each phase depends largely on volatility and polarity. When PM is collected on a fiber filter, POC may volatilize once collected, or gaseous components may adsorb to either the filtration medium or previously collected particulate matter and therefore become apparent POC. These processes, known as collection artifacts, therefore, may cause a positive or negative measurement biases compared with the actual concentration found in the air at the time of collection. The objective of this research was to characterize the magnitude of these collection artifacts to assess the contribution and sources of POC to PM2.5, and to devise a practical method of minimizing these artifacts based on diffusion denuding and impaction.

Summary/Accomplishments (Outputs/Outcomes):

The most appropriate method to minimize collection artifacts uses a denuder to remove gas phase interfering species and then samples with a medium capable of quantitatively capturing the particulate phase. The denuder must be capable of removing hundreds of different potentially interfering species while the collection medium must be able to effectively trap as many. This project evaluated, under ambient sampling conditions, the best methods to evaluate and minimize the POC collection artifact. The approach is to simultaneously collect POC using nine sampling configurations and compare the results with the PM2.5 Federal Reference Method. The methods are (1) a dual quartz filter pack (2) a Teflon-quartz-quartz filter pack, (3) a quartz fiber denuder followed by a quartz-quartz filter pack, (4) an impactor to remove particles greater than 0.05µm diameter followed by a quartz-quartz filter pack, (5) an impactor preceded by a quartz fiber denuder and followed by a quartz-quartz filter pack, (6) an impactor followed by a quartz fiber denuder and quartz-quartz filter pack, (7) a Teflon filter followed by an impactor, followed by a quartz-quartz filter pack, (8) a carbon-based parallel plate denuder followed by a quartz-quartz filter pack followed by a carbon-impregnated glass fiber filter and, (9) a Teflon filter followed by a carbon-based parallel plate denuder followed a quartz-quartz filter pack followed by a carbon-impregnated glass fiber filter. Collection substrates were analyzed for organic and elemental carbon using a thermal volatilization-oxidation approach.

Figure 1. Schematic drawing of the nine channel POC sampler

CONFIGURATION                       ANALYSIS                 PARAMETER / FUNCTION

1.         ____  Q                                TOA                              PM2.5  POC
            ____  Q                                TOA                              Adsorbed VOC, VPOC

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.         ____  T                                Mass                              Federal Method PM2.5 reference
            ____  Q                                TOA                              Adsorbed VOC, VPOC
            ____  Q                                TOA                              Adsorbed VOC, VPOC
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
3.           /Q/                                      none                               Removes VOC that adsorb on quartz filter
            ____ Q                                 TOA                              POC w/o adsorbed gases
            ____ Q                                 TOA                              Indicates /Q/ efficiency or adsorbed VPOC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.         ------  I                                  TOA                              POC w/o adsorption or volatilization
            ____ Q                                 TOA                              Very fine POC, adsorbed VOC, VPOC
            ____ Q                                 TOA                              Adsorbed VOC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
             /Q/                                       none                               VOCs that adsorb on quartz filter medium removed      
5.         ------  I                                  TOA                              POC w/o adsorption or volatilization?
            ____ Q                                 TOA                              Very fine POC, adsorbed VPOC
            ____ Q                                 TOA                             Adsorbed VOC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.         ------  I                                  TOA                              POC w/o adsorption or volatilization
             /Q/                                       none                               VPOC, VOC that adsorb on quartz removed
            ____ Q                                 TOA                              Very fine POC
            ____ Q                                 TOA                              Potentially very little OC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7.         ____ T                                 none                               Removes POC
            ------  I                                  TOA                              Dynamic POC blank
            ____ Q                                 TOA                              Adsorbed VOC, VPOC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8.         /C/                                       none                               Removes VOC
            ____ Q                                 TOA                              POC, remaining VOC
            ____ Q                                 TOA                              Adsorbed VPOC, remaining VOC
            ____ CIF                              TPV                               Remaining VOC, VPOC
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9.         ____ T                                 none                               Removes POC
             /C/                                       none                               Removes VOC
            ____ Q                                 TOA                              Absorbed remaining VOC+VPOC
            ____ Q                                 TOA                              As above, measure of Q breakthrough
          ____ CIF                               TPV                               Remaining VOC+VPOC

Q=quartz filter, T=Teflon filter, I=Impactor, /Q/=quartz fiber filter denuder, /C/=carbon impregnated filter denuder, CIF=carbon impregnated filter, VOC=volatile organic carbon, POC=particulate organic carbon, VPOC=volatilized POC, TOA= thermal optical analysis, TPV= temperature programmed volatilization

Conclusions:

A nine channel sampler shown in Figure 1 was used to evaluate POC sampling artifacts when sampling both ambient air and diesel exhaust. Samples were collected on quartz filters, aluminum impactor substrates, and carbon impregnated glass fiber filters and analyzed for organic and elemental carbon content by thermal volatilization methods. Parallel plate denuders with quartz filter strips were evaluated for removing VOC that would deposit on quartz filters while similar denuders using strips of carbon impregnated cellulose filter were used to remove all VOC.

A significant (30-40%) positive POC collection artifact was found for both sample types when using quartz fiber filters. Quartz filters appear to have a strong affinity to collect VOC. Correction for this sampling artifact can be made by subtracting the OC found on a quartz filter that samples air from which the particulate matter has been removed by a Teflon filter. Similar results were obtained from a cascade impactor with aluminum substrates followed by a quartz after-filter. Since the impactor stages collect most of the particulate matter and little VOC, the correction for the after-filter (using the OC on a separate quartz filter following a Teflon filter) is quite large, approximately 90% of the OC on this filter is an adsorption artifact. Given this large correction, sampling with quartz filters is preferred if a particle-size distribution is not needed. Good comparability found between the two sampling approaches gave a strong indication that the collection artifact is due to adsorption of VOC by quartz filters and not volatilization of collected particulate matter followed by capture on the quartz filter. If the latter were significant, more volatilization would be expected from a quartz filter than from an impaction substrates in which the particles collected are almost immediately covered with other particles.

If a cascade impactor is to be used then the OC/EC split on the aluminum impactor substrates should be verified (since no correction can be made for charring) by summing the EC on the impactor stages and comparing with the difference between the EC on a collocated quartz filter less the EC on the after-filter.

The denuders used were found to be too ineffective to evaluate sampling artifacts. Since the positive collection artifact on quartz fiber filter may be corrected using a quartz back filter, the expensive and handling of denuders is not warranted for routine sampling.

Since the collection artifact for POC was found to be due primarily to the affinity of quartz filter to adsorb VOC and not due to particle volatilization, Teflon filters used for the EPA’s PM2.5 reference methods should not be affected to a significant degree.

Journal Articles:

No journal articles submitted with this report: View all 2 publications for this project

Supplemental Keywords:

ambient air, monitoring, measurement methods, adsorption, particulates,, RFA, Air, Scientific Discipline, Ecosystem Protection/Environmental Exposure & Risk, Waste, chemical mixtures, particulate matter, Air Quality, Environmental Chemistry, Engineering, Chemistry, & Physics, Monitoring/Modeling, Air Pollution Effects, Atmospheric Sciences, air toxics, Environmental Engineering, Environmental Monitoring, aerosol particles, health effects, particle size, air sampling, gas chromatography, mass spectrometry, carbon particles, emissions, chemical characteristics, air quality modeling, measurement methods, airborne particulate matter, atmospheric particles, quartz fiber filter denuders, modeling studies, thermal desorption, particulate matter mass, air quality model, particulate organic carbon, carbon aerosols, aerosol analyzers, air quality models, atmospheric particulate matter, impactors, ultrafine particulate matter, chemical speciation sampling, particle size measurement, air pollutants, particle dispersion, air modeling

Progress and Final Reports:

Original Abstract
  • 2004 Progress Report
  • 2005 Progress Report
  • 2006 Progress Report
  • 2007
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • 2007
    • 2006 Progress Report
    • 2005 Progress Report
    • 2004 Progress Report
    • Original Abstract
    2 publications for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.