Grantee Research Project Results
Children's Vulnerability to Environmental Immunotoxicant Exposure
EPA Grant Number: R830758Title: Children's Vulnerability to Environmental Immunotoxicant Exposure
Investigators: Grandjean, Philippe
Current Investigators: Grandjean, Philippe , Weihe, Pal
Institution: Harvard University
EPA Project Officer: Aja, Hayley
Project Period: May 5, 2003 through May 4, 2006 (Extended to May 4, 2007)
Project Amount: $750,000
RFA: Children's Vulnerability to Toxic Substances in the Environment (2002) RFA Text | Recipients Lists
Research Category: Children's Health , Human Health
Objective:
This project aims at determining the immunotoxic risk in children exposed prenatally and postnatally to polychlorinated biphenyls. Experimental animal studies with Aroclor 1254 used by EPA for calculating a Reference Dose (RfD) for PCB suggest that immunotoxicity may be critical, but current exposures, especially those from breast-feeding, greatly exceed the RfD.
Approach:
A birth cohort of 547 Faroese children was established in 1998-2000. Because of PCB-contaminated seafood, some mothers have PCB concentrations that exceed U.S. averages by up to 100-fold. In a small-scale pilot study, we showed PCB-related decreases in antibody responses against primary protein antigens from the 12-month vaccination. The proposed study will focus on antibody responses of the full cohort to the scheduled vaccinations at age 5 years. The response variables depend on both T-cell and B-cell functions and are feasible for a field study, clinically highly relevant and also ethically acceptable. Immune deficits will be related to measures of prenatal and postnatal PCB exposure and to in vitro activation of the arylhydrocarbon receptor measured in maternal pregnancy serum by a novel approach. This new technique will include a newly discovered promoter sequence to assess different aspects of AhR activation. The high statistical power will allow advanced statistical analyses.
Expected Results:
Because the birth cohort has already been established, and exposure assessment is already under way, the proposed study of antibody responses to the 5-year vaccinations will be possible within the 3-year grant period. The vaccine response is a clinically valid and highly relevant indicator of immune function, which is also feasible for population studies in the field. Exposure-related deficits in antibody responses are already known to occur in this population. With about 500 children examined, benchmark dose calculations will be possible, the relative impact of prenatal and lactational exposures may be assessed, as will the validity of individual chemical exposure biomarkers and the AhR activation by serum as assessed by the traditional and a novel method.
Publications and Presentations:
Publications have been submitted on this project: View all 16 publications for this projectJournal Articles:
Journal Articles have been submitted on this project: View all 13 journal articles for this projectSupplemental Keywords:
cumulative effects, dioxin, dose-response, epidemiology, human health, hypersusceptibility, infants, marine food contamination, methylmercury, mixed exposure, prenatal exposure delayed response, risk assessment, sensitive populations, RFA, Health, Scientific Discipline, PHYSICAL ASPECTS, INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION, ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, HUMAN HEALTH, Exposure, Health Risk Assessment, Risk Assessments, Physical Processes, Biochemistry, Children's Health, Environmental Policy, Risk Assessment, health effects, pesticide exposure, prenatal exposure, post-natal exposure, vulnerability, animal model, developmental toxicity, developmental effects, polychlorinated biphenyl, pesticides, Human Health Risk Assessment, children's vulnerablity, PCB, children's environmental health, immunotoxicology, pregnant women, dietary exposure, exposure assessmentProgress and Final Reports:
The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.