Grantee Research Project Results
Beneficial Reuse of Foundry Sands in Controlled Low-Strength Material
EPA Grant Number: U915330Title: Beneficial Reuse of Foundry Sands in Controlled Low-Strength Material
Investigators: Dingrando, Jeffrey S.
Institution: University of Wisconsin - Madison
EPA Project Officer: Packard, Benjamin H
Project Period: September 1, 1998 through September 1, 2001
Project Amount: $34,000
RFA: STAR Graduate Fellowships (1998) RFA Text | Recipients Lists
Research Category: Academic Fellowships , Safer Chemicals , Fellowship - Civil Engineering
Objective:
The objective of this research project is to: (1) assess the feasibility of using waste foundry sands as fine aggregate in controlled, low-strength material (flowable fill); and (2) categorize waste foundry sands based on performance in flowable fill to simplify mix design and increase opportunities for beneficial reuse of waste foundry sand.
Approach:
A number of different foundry sands, representative of the foundry sands used in Wisconsin, were mixed with portland cement, fly ash, and water to create flowable fill. Mix performance was based on key criteria for flowable fill: flowability, setting time, and strength. First, components were mixed in various proportions until a minimum flow was achieved. Minimum flow refers to a condition in which the material is self-compacting, self-leveling, and will flow around obstructions. The changes in flow over time, because of thixotropic effects of the clay fraction of foundry sand and/or cementation effects, also were evaluated. Second, mixes were tested for strength and strength gain over time with unconfined compression tests. Achieving some minimum strength is required to accept loads such as pavement and traffic. However, limiting the strength to some maximum also is critical because most flowable fill applications require the ability to excavate the material at a later date. The effects of environmental factors (freeze-thaw, wet-dry) on the durability of the materials also were evaluated. Changes in sand type, cement content, fly ash content, and water content were correlated to performance, and conclusions were made about the influence of each factor. The applicability of flowable fill test methods, which are relatively new, also was examined, and recommendations were made for future testing procedures.
Supplemental Keywords:
fellowship, foundry sands, clay fraction, cement, fly ash, flowable fill, waste foundry sand, reuse., RFA, Scientific Discipline, Sustainable Industry/Business, cleaner production/pollution prevention, Sustainable Environment, Chemistry, Civil/Environmental Engineering, Technology for Sustainable Environment, Chemistry and Materials Science, New/Innovative technologies, Environmental Engineering, foundary industry, waste reduction, foundry industry, construction fill, controlled low strength material (CLSM), optimal mix proportions, alternative materials, metal casting, optimization, benonite, construction material, generic mix designProgress and Final Reports:
The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.