Grantee Research Project Results
Catalytic Lean Burn Gasoline Engine
EPA Contract Number: 68D10060Title: Catalytic Lean Burn Gasoline Engine
Investigators: Pfefferle, William
Small Business: Precision Combustion, Inc.
EPA Contact: Richards, April
Phase: I
Project Period: September 1, 1991 through March 1, 1992
Project Amount: $49,922
RFA: Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) - Phase I (1991) RFA Text | Recipients Lists
Research Category: SBIR - Air Pollution , Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) , Air Quality and Air Toxics
Description:
Precision Combustion, Inc., proposes to explore catalytic coatings on the combustion chamber walls of small utility engines in a continuing modification of small gasoline engines so that ultimately they will be able to operate at truly lean fuel/air ratios favoring low HC, CO, and NOx emissions. The current simplicity of these engines offers some good opportunities for this approach to succeed. A spinoff benefit would likely be technology to similarly modify the more-complex automotive Otto-cycle engine by compiling research data on the effect of catalytic surfaces on engine performance and emissions.In Phase 1, small engine testing in a well-instrumented engine test cell will explore this catalytic lean burn concept on a four-stroke engine. In Phase II, the concept would be carried forward to engine optimization.
Supplemental Keywords:
Sustainable Industry/Business, Scientific Discipline, Air, Toxics, Technology for Sustainable Environment, Engineering, Chemistry, HAPS, Engineering, Chemistry, & Physics, cleaner production/pollution prevention, air toxics, New/Innovative technologies, catalytic combustion, hydrocarbons, novel catalyst systems, lean burn engines, emissions, hydrocarbon, coatings, nitrogren oxides (NOx), Nitrogen Oxides, Nox, lean burn engine, emission controls, carbon monoxide, control, nitrogen oxides (Nox), emission control technologies, engine, air pollutants, air pollution, catalytic coating, acid rain, air pollution controlProgress and Final Reports:
The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.