Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Valuing Reductions in Environmental Sources of Infertility Risk Using the Efficient Household Framework

EPA Grant Number: R825308
Title: Valuing Reductions in Environmental Sources of Infertility Risk Using the Efficient Household Framework
Investigators: Van Houtven, George L. , Smith, V. Kerry
Institution: Desert Research Institute , Duke University
EPA Project Officer: Chung, Serena
Project Period: October 1, 1996 through September 30, 1997
Project Amount: $170,971
RFA: Decision-Making and Valuation for Environmental Policy (1996) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Environmental Justice

Description:

There is an increasing body evidence suggesting that a broad range of pollutants have the potential to alter human endocrine systems. One disturbing consequence of exposures to these endocrine disruptors is that they may significantly increase the incidence of infertility in exposed populations. The purpose of this research is to develop and evaluate a methodology for assessing the magnitude of human values associated with reducing infertility risks from environmental sources. Most previous research in health and environmental valuation has focused on individual decisions; however, infertility risks clearly present a context where the household (i.e., the couple) is the relevant decision making unit. This research will develop and refine a conceptual framework for linking collective (household) decisions to the preferences of the individual members. It will provide a conceptual basis for deriving how measures of economic welfare based on households' observed or stated decisions relate to the preferences of the individual adult members living in that household. A series of focus groups will be conducted to evaluate hypotheses from the conceptual model and to explore couples' perceptions and attitudes regarding infertility risks and their joint decision processes for addressing infertility problems. One set of focus groups will be conducted with couples who wish to have children but have not yet resolved their fertility status. This will provide an ex ante perspective on couples' perceptions regarding the risks and implications of experiencing infertility. Participants will also be asked to evaluate proposed intervention programs or plans for reducing the risks of infertility. A second set of focus groups will be conducted with couples who are currently undergoing infertility treatment in order to examine how their expectations changed through their experiences, how the views on infertility differed within couples, and how they arrived at joint decisions regarding remedial expenditures and procedures. The focus groups will provide qualitative empirical support for the development of the conceptual model. They will also provide an important foundation for future applied research examining household decisions, particularly with regard to valuing reductions in infertility risks.

Publications and Presentations:

Publications have been submitted on this project: View all 5 publications for this project

Supplemental Keywords:

valuation, public preference, cost-benefit., RFA, Health, Scientific Discipline, Economic, Social, & Behavioral Science Research Program, Economics & Decision Making, Ecological Risk Assessment, Health Risk Assessment, Risk Assessments, decision-making, Social Science, Ecology and Ecosystems, compensation, public values, efficient household framework, economic benefits, public resources, valuing environmental quality, infertility risk, community-based, cost benefit, ecosystem valuation, policy analysis, standards of value, human exposure, cost effectiveness, stakeholder, cost/benefit analysis, environmental values, public policy, decision analysis, economic incentives, information dissemination, psychological attitudes, social psychology, valuation, endocrine disruptors, risk preferences, environmental policy, interviews

Progress and Final Reports:

  • Final Report
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final Report
    5 publications for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.