Grantee Research Project Results
High Efficiency and Low Cost NOx Control via Promoted N-Agent Injection
EPA Contract Number: 68D70017Title: High Efficiency and Low Cost NOx Control via Promoted N-Agent Injection
Investigators: Seeker, William Randall
Small Business: Energy and Environmental Research Corporation (CA)
EPA Contact: Richards, April
Phase: I
Project Period: September 1, 1997 through March 1, 1998
Project Amount: $70,000
RFA: Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) - Phase I (1997) RFA Text | Recipients Lists
Research Category: SBIR - Air Pollution , Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) , Air Quality and Air Toxics
Description:
Prospective technologies for stationary post-combustion NOx control include: Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) and Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR). These processes reduce NOx by non-catalytic or catalytic reactions with N-Agents (ammonia or urea). There are several problems with SCR, such as high capital cost, limited catalyst life, catalyst poisoning, and disposal. SNCR is less expensive, but capabilities of SNCR are limited by the narrow temperature window of NOx control, ammonia slip, low utilization (about 27%) of N-Agents, and formation of N2O with urea injection. This Phase I project is directed towards improving performance of the SNCR process in the presence of promoters. The project will demonstrate that the Promoted N-Agent injection process can eliminate or minimize all of the limitations described above. The promoters are water soluble inorganic salts, which are added in small quantities to the N-Agent solution. The goal of the project is to achieve 90% NOx removal in pilot scale with less than 5% promoter concentration from initial N-Agent level at less than 5 ppm NH3/N2O emissions while utilizing at least 60% N-Agent. In a combination with other inexpensive NOx control methods (such as low NOx burners and/or reburning), the process makes it possible to reduce NOx by more than 95%. Cost analysis indicates that the Promoted N-Agent injection process is significantly less expensive than competing technologies. Its cost, in terms of $/ton of NOx removed, is lower by a factor of 2 than the cost of conventional SNCR and a factor of 6 in comparison with SCR.Supplemental Keywords:
small business, SBIR, air emissions, engineering, chemistry., Sustainable Industry/Business, RFA, Air, Scientific Discipline, Toxics, Technology for Sustainable Environment, Chemical Engineering, Engineering, Chemistry, Sustainable Environment, HAPS, Environmental Chemistry, Engineering, Chemistry, & Physics, EPCRA, VOCs, cleaner production/pollution prevention, air toxics, Environmental Engineering, removal, clean technology, pollution prevention, Nox, Sulfur Oxides (SO2), Nitrogen Oxides, selective catalytic reduction, selective catalytic reduction (SCR), control, cost effective, selective non-catalytic reduction, nitrogen oxides (Nox), SO2, selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR), cleaner production, sulfur oxides, N-Agent Injection, Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs), Sulfur dioxideProgress and Final Reports:
The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.