Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

    • Environmental Topics
    • Air
    • Bed Bugs
    • Chemicals and Toxics
    • Climate Change
    • Emergency Response
    • Environmental Information by Location
    • Environmental Justice
    • Greener Living
    • Health
    • Land, Waste, and Cleanup
    • Lead
    • Mold
    • Pesticides
    • Radon
    • Science Topics
    • Water Topics
    • A-Z Topic Index
    • Laws & Regulations
    • By Business Sector
    • By Topic
    • Compliance
    • Enforcement
    • Guidance
    • Laws and Executive Orders
    • Regulations
    • Report a Violation
    • Environmental Violations
    • Fraud, Waste or Abuse
    • About EPA
    • EPA Administrator
    • Organization Chart
    • Staff Directory
    • Planning, Budget, and Results
    • Jobs and Internships
    • Headquarters Offices
    • Regional Offices
    • Lab and Research Centers
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Investigating the distribution and value of water quality benefits along the Mississippi River

EPA Grant Number: R840464
Title: Investigating the distribution and value of water quality benefits along the Mississippi River
Investigators: Keeler, Bonnie L , Lupi, Frank , Wood, Spencer
Institution: University of Minnesota , Michigan State University , University of Washington
EPA Project Officer: Packard, Benjamin H
Project Period: September 1, 2022 through August 31, 2025
Project Amount: $742,000
RFA: Water Quality Benefits (2022) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Water Quality , Water

Objective:

 Our proposal is motivated by the following four objectives:1. Observe how values for water-quality benefits vary across socioeconomic and geographic scales and among population groups of concern. 2. Understand tradeoffs between objectives of equity and efficiency associated with potential investments in improved water quality or river restoration, 3. Compare non-market surveys with novel methods for panel recruitment and value elicitation using geolocated social media, mobile technologies, and community science approaches, 4. Build capacity for river communities to improve environmental outcomes and advocate for more just and sustainable futures.

Approach:

Our approach includes a non-market valuation survey administered to residents of the 246 counties and parishes that border or are adjacent to the Mississippi River. The survey will ask respondents to report single day and overnight trips to the River and include a discrete choice referendum based on proposed changes in watershed restoration and management that affect recreational, cultural, and/or ecological values. In addition to a “push to web” approach based on postcard mailers to a randomly-selected address‐based sample, we will identify potential survey participants via social media profiles. We will also deploy signage at river locations encouraging visitors to use an SMS app on their mobile device to engage with a conversational chatbot that will also direct users to the online survey. Engagement with community organizations working on environmental justice along the River will take the form of participatory workshops and co-design of citizen science approaches that address community-articulated priorities for restoration or management such as perceived health or safety concerns related to the River.

Expected Results:

Our expected results include new methods of eliciting environmental values and insights into how different methods lead to alternative policy conclusions across equity and efficiency objectives. In doing so, we seek to advance a more inclusive and pluralistic approach to regulatory review that facilitates interdisciplinary collaboration, develops practical tools for policy analysis, and leads to improved understanding of the benefits and distribution of water quality changes.

Supplemental Keywords:

contingent valuation, big data, social science, public policy, decision-making, community-based, cost-benefit, public good, willingness-to-pay

Site Navigation

  • Grantee Research Project Results Home
  • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
  • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
  • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
  • Publication search
  • EPA Regional Search

Related Information

  • Search Help
  • About our data collection
  • Research Grants
  • P3: Student Design Competition
  • Research Fellowships
  • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)

Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.

United States Environmental Protection Agency

Discover.

  • Accessibility
  • Budget & Performance
  • Contracting
  • EPA www Web Snapshot
  • Grants
  • No FEAR Act Data
  • Plain Writing
  • Privacy
  • Privacy and Security Notice

Connect.

  • Data.gov
  • Inspector General
  • Jobs
  • Newsroom
  • Open Government
  • Regulations.gov
  • Subscribe
  • USA.gov
  • White House

Ask.

  • Contact EPA
  • EPA Disclaimers
  • Hotlines
  • FOIA Requests
  • Frequent Questions

Follow.

Last updated on October 20, 2022