Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Comparative Mechanisms of Benzo[a]pyrene Metabolism and DNA Repair in Two Species of Ictalurid Catfish

EPA Grant Number: R827101
Title: Comparative Mechanisms of Benzo[a]pyrene Metabolism and DNA Repair in Two Species of Ictalurid Catfish
Investigators: Di Giulio, Richard T. , Willett, Kristine L. , MacLean, Elizabeth , Meyer, Joel
Current Investigators: Di Giulio, Richard T. , Willett, Kristine L. , Lienesch, Laila , Rau, Michelle
Institution: Duke University
EPA Project Officer: Hahn, Intaek
Project Period: October 1, 1998 through September 30, 2001 (Extended to September 30, 2003)
Project Amount: $314,023
RFA: Exploratory Research - Environmental Biology (1998) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Aquatic Ecosystems , Biology/Life Sciences , Human Health

Description:

Hypothesis 1. The channel catfish more rapidly eliminates benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) than the more hepatic neoplasia-sensitive brown bullhead due to greater hepatic phase II metabolic activities towards BaP. Objective 1a. To determine the hepatic activities of the major enzymes likely to be involved in the further metabolism of the BaP products (e.g., diols, phenols and epoxides) resulting from CYP1A-catalyzed oxidations in these species. These enzymes are: epoxide hydrolase (EH), glutathione S-transferases (GST), uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases (UDPGT), and sulfotransferases (ST). Objective 1b. To determine rates of BaP metabolite formation catalyzed by these enzymes in isolated hepatocytes from both species. Objective 1c. To determine rates of biliary excretion of BaP metabolites by these species following in vivo exposures.

Hypothesis 2. The channel catfish more rapidly repairs BaP-DNA adducts in liver tissue than the brown bullhead. Objective 2. To compare the activities of nucleotide excision repair systems in tissue extracts from both species targeted to plasmid BaP-DNA adducts.

Approach:

Phase II metabolism of BaP will be addressed in vitro and in vivo. Subcellular fractions (microsomes and cytosol as appropriate) will be used to determine relative activities of enzymes (EH, GST, UDPGT and ST) towards standard substrates and towards selected phase I metabolites of BaP. Primary hepatocytes of both species will be used to compare the integrated metabolism of BaP in these animals. Studies of bile metabolites of BaP from fish exposed in vivo will be employed to corroborate results from in vitro experiments. Nucleotide excision repair (NER), the dominant mechanism of bulky adduct repair in eukaryotes, will be addressed by comparing the abilities of cell free extracts from heptocytes of these two species to repair BaP metabolites adducted to plasmid DNA.

Expected Results:

Previous work in our laboratory has yielded the counter-intuitive result that the cancer-sensitive bullhead has significantly less capacity to activate BaP to genotoxic metabolites, via CYP1A metabolism, than the resistant channel catfish. The project proposed herein will determine if differences in subsequent detoxification-oriented metabolic pathways and/or DNA repair can explain the marked differential susceptibility in these closely-related fishes. The results of this project will contribute significantly to our understanding of biological phenomena that underlie differential chemical sensitivity that is important to understanding why certain species, or individuals within a species (including humans) are relatively susceptible to toxic effects. As our approaches to risk assessment and environmental protection become more sophisticated, it is becoming increasingly evident that efforts should be directed towards sensitive components of ecosystems and populations, not the "mean."

Publications and Presentations:

Publications have been submitted on this project: View all 5 publications for this project

Journal Articles:

Journal Articles have been submitted on this project: View all 1 journal articles for this project

Supplemental Keywords:

polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, surface water,, RFA, Ecosystem Protection/Environmental Exposure & Risk, Scientific Discipline, Toxics, Aquatic Ecosystem, National Recommended Water Quality, Aquatic Ecosystems & Estuarine Research, Biology, Environmental Microbiology, Molecular Biology/Genetics, ecology, water quality, cellular physiology, channel catfish, cellular biology, BenzoaPyrene, bullhead catfish, DNA repair, microbiology, ictalurid catfish

Progress and Final Reports:

  • 1999 Progress Report
  • 2000
  • 2001
  • 2002
  • Final
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final
    • 2002
    • 2001
    • 2000
    • 1999 Progress Report
    5 publications for this project
    1 journal articles for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.