Grantee Research Project Results
Green Oak as a Sustainable Building Material
EPA Grant Number: SU835495Title: Green Oak as a Sustainable Building Material
Investigators: Shelton, Ted , French, Robert C. , Taylor, Adam M , Bennett, Richard M , Retherford, Jennifer , Stuth, Tricia
Current Investigators: Shelton, Ted , French, Robert C. , Taylor, Adam M , Bennett, Richard M , Hatcher, Alex , Reed, Bhen , Retherford, Jennifer , Iden, Matt , Cunningham, Michael , Wright, Miranda , Graham, Natalie , Poor, Noah , Attea, Paul , Heldic, Rijad , Sugiyama, Sherif , Whitmore, Steven , Stuth, Tricia , Rasnake, Tyler , Kessel, Wilson
Institution: University of Tennessee
EPA Project Officer: Packard, Benjamin H
Phase: I
Project Period: August 15, 2013 through August 14, 2014
Project Amount: $14,977
RFA: P3 Awards: A National Student Design Competition for Sustainability Focusing on People, Prosperity and the Planet (2013) RFA Text | Recipients Lists
Research Category: Pollution Prevention/Sustainable Development , P3 Challenge Area - Sustainable and Healthy Communities , P3 Awards , Sustainable and Healthy Communities
Objective:
- To develop contemporary green (un-dried) oak construction techniques for the US building market that will allow currently underutilized heart centers of logs to be used as an extremely low energy, carbon friendly, beautiful, and high value wood product – as structural members in sustainable buildings.
- To develop technical documentation necessary for the construction of a demonstration project that will further acceptance of this abundant, renewable regional resource.
Approach:
In the Appalachian hardwood region, the “heart-centers” of hardwood logs are an exception to the otherwise very efficient use of this renewable and sustainably harvested resource. Because this wood has defects that limit its usefulness for traditional dry lumber products, this portion of the log is routinely sold green (un-dried) as “cants” used to manufacture shipping pallets. We will conduct the fundamental research necessary to allow for the use of green oak as a structural element in the US building market. There is very little contemporary architectural or engineering knowledge in the US about using green oak in building design and no recognition of this type of construction in building codes. Our work will respond to the specifics of species, dimensions, and properties of oak pallet cants in an effort to transform this resource to structural uses while requiring no operational changes for local saw mills.
The research team will conduct a variety of investigations. These include adapting European green oak grading standards to grading oak pallet cants for structural use, confirming grading standards by mechanically testing pallet cants, and examining structural bearing and spanning capabilities of pallet cants through calculation and modeling, and the design of composite members and trusses. We will also adapt European contemporary green oak detailing practices to the smaller cross-section (4 in. x 6 in.) and limited length of pallet cants.
Expected Results:
Technical documentation necessary for a project demonstrating the viability of green oak as a contemporary structural material. These will include material grading guidelines, mechanical testing, architectural construction documents and details, specifications, engineering calculations, and lessons learned from the construction of full scale mock ups.Publications and Presentations:
Publications have been submitted on this project: View all 2 publications for this projectSupplemental Keywords:
environmentally benign substitute, conservation, design for the environment, green building, alternative construction material, architectural design;Relevant Websites:
Phase 2 AbstractProgress and Final Reports:
P3 Phase II:
Green Oak as a Sustainable Building Material | 2015 Progress Report | 2016 Progress Report | Final ReportThe perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.