Final Report: A Continuation of Remediation of Brine Spills with HayEPA Grant Number: R830633C002
Alternative EPA Grant Number: R827015C025
Subproject: this is subproject number 002 , established and managed by the Center Director under grant R830633
(EPA does not fund or establish subprojects; EPA awards and manages the overall grant for this center).
Center: IPEC University of Tulsa (TU)
Center Director: Sublette, Kerry L.
Title: A Continuation of Remediation of Brine Spills with Hay
Investigators: Ford, Laura P. , Sublette, Kerry L.
Institution: University of Tulsa
EPA Project Officer: Lasat, Mitch
Project Period: May 1, 2003 through April 30, 2004
Project Amount: Refer to main center abstract for funding details.
RFA: Integrated Petroleum Environmental Consortium (IPEC) (1999) RFA Text | Recipients Lists
Research Category: Targeted Research
The overall objective of this project is to study the possible positive effect of organic matter in the remediation of brine-impacted soil. The efficacy of this treatment will be quantified in a field study conducted in the Tallgrass Prairie Preserve in Osage Co., Oklahoma. The study will also attempt to identify the mechanism or mechanisms of action of the organic matter, which possibly include: 1) a strictly physical effect on the texture of the soil; 2) an enhancement of the cation exchange capacity of the soil; 3) an enhancement of the water-stable aggregates formed from organic matter and soil mineral particles. Given that the all three of these mechanisms are affected by microbial action on the hay, the microbial populations will be determined both qualitatively and quantitatively and then correlated with the results of the field studies.
First order rate constants for salt removal are shown in Table 1. For Gibbs 7, tilling with hay and fertilizers proved to be the best treatment for salt removal (80% confidence level, CL). For Gibbs 9, which is rockier than Gibbs 7, tilling was the best treatment for salt removal (79% CL). Our proposed treatment did not always improve the salt removal.
Data regarding our proposed mechanisms for both contaminated and control sites are presented in Table 2. Hay increased the soil’s cation exchange capacity (99.9% CL), wet aggregate stability (99.0% CL), and soil moisture level (99.9% CL), but fertilizers decreased the cation exchange capacity and soil moisture levels (both at 95% CL). Although two of our proposed mechanisms, cation exchange capacity and wet aggregate stability, were activated by hay, their improvement did not consistently translate into improved salt removal rates.
Since microbial action is important to our proposed mechanisms, we investigated the microbial populations in the soils with phospholipid fatty acid analysis (PLFA). The results of statistical analysis on the PLFA data are given in Table 3. Fertilizers increased the ratios of prokaryote and eukaryote populations in the contaminated sites to their populations in the treated controls, but hay increased only the ratio of the contaminated prokaryote population to the treated control population. There were also cross effects with treatment and time, but hay and fertilizer did not interact. Hay did increase the proportion of eukaryotes in the soil, thereby decreasing the Shannon’s diversity index based on the soil microbial community. Fertilizers increased the microbial stress and decreased the growth rate of Gram-negative bacteria. Since fertilizers and hay brought the prokaryote and eukaryote populations closer to their treated control populations, they are considered to be restoring the ecosystem. DGGE samples from April 2004 did not show interesting band patterns by either treatment or site, so sequencing was not done.
Microcosms were made to study the effects of the treatments on the microbial population under controlled environmental conditions. Each of the field treatments was duplicated in a set of eight microcosms. PLFA data for the microcosms (Table 4) are similar to those for the field sites in some respects but not all. Fertilizer had no effects in the microcosms than in the field sites, hay had more significant effects in the microcosms, and there were no significant interactions in the microcosms. The addition of hay increased eukaryote and prokaryote PLFA concentrations. The community structure in all of the microcosms shifted toward the monoenoics and branched monoenoics over time, but the microcosms with hay shifted much more toward eukaryotes, primarily fungal, and away from mid-chain branched saturates, characteristic of actinomycetes, and the terminally branched saturates. Fertilizer did appear to somewhat decrease the diversity of the bacterial communities when examined using DGGE, although this was not apparent from the PLFA data. Small but statistically significant differences with treatment were seen in the metabolic status ratio and the environment stress for Gram-negative bacteria, but on the average the microcosms were in the stationary phase and relatively non-stressed. Shannon’s diversity index increased with time and then decreased, and the diversity was lower with hay, due to the increased dominance of certain groups, primarily fungi. SEM images of hay from the microcosms appear to show bacteria and hyphae on the hay.
As a bonus, a second microcosm study was done to compare leaching rates from contaminated soil treated with tilling alone and tilling, hay, and fertilizers. The microcosms that received hay and fertilizers had slower salt removal rates, but only at the 70% confidence level. Microcosms with hay and fertilizers had higher soil moisture levels and produced less leachate which was more concentrated with brine components.
We continue to recommend treatment of brine-contaminated sites with tilling, fertilizers, and hay. Tilling with hay and fertilizers was the best salt removal treatment in Gibbs 7 which has a flat slope and non-rocky soil. Tilling alone may be the best treatment for salt removal in steep, rocky sites, but the fertilizers and hay improve the microbial community, which will improve the rest of the ecosystem over time.
Journal Articles:No journal articles submitted with this report: View all 3 publications for this subproject
Supplemental Keywords:land, precipitation, ecological effects, indicators, restoration, terrestrial, remediation, bioremediation, cleanup, public policy, cost benefit, environmental chemistry, biology, engineering, ecology, hydrology, south central, Oklahoma, OK, EPA Region 6, agriculture, Crude Petroleum and Natural Gas (SIC 1311), Crude Petroleum Pipelines (SIC 4612),, RFA, Scientific Discipline, TREATMENT/CONTROL, Waste, Sustainable Industry/Business, Sustainable Environment, Treatment Technologies, Remediation, Technology for Sustainable Environment, Ecological Risk Assessment, decontamination, environmental technology, contaminated sediments, petroleum contaminated soil, environmental sustainability, petrochemicals, petroleum industry, remediation technologies, ecological impacts, environmental regulations, environmental education, bioremediation
Main Center Abstract and Reports:R830633 IPEC University of Tulsa (TU)
Subprojects under this Center: (EPA does not fund or establish subprojects; EPA awards and manages the overall grant for this center).
R830633C001 Development of an Environmentally Friendly and Economical Process for Plugging Abandoned Wells (Phase II)
R830633C002 A Continuation of Remediation of Brine Spills with Hay
R830633C003 Effective Stormwater and Sediment Control During Pipeline Construction Using a New Filter Fence Concept
R830633C004 Evaluation of Sub-micellar Synthetic Surfactants versus Biosurfactants for Enhanced LNAPL Recovery
R830633C005 Utilization of the Carbon and Hydrogen Isotopic Composition of Individual Compounds in Refined Hydrocarbon Products To Monitor Their Fate in the Environment
R830633C006 Evaluation of Commercial, Microbial-Based Products to Treat Paraffin Deposition in Tank Bottoms and Oil Production Equipment
R830633C007 Identifying the Signature of the Natural Attenuation in the Microbial Ecology of Hydrocarbon Contaminated Groundwater Using Molecular Methods and “Bug Traps”
R830633C008 Using Plants to Remediate Petroleum-Contaminated Soil: Project Continuation
R830633C009 Use of Earthworms to Accelerate the Restoration of Oil and Brine Impacted Sites