2017 Progress Report: Development of 3D-printed surfaces for ultra-high surface area biofilters for water pollution remediation

EPA Grant Number: SV836951
Title: Development of 3D-printed surfaces for ultra-high surface area biofilters for water pollution remediation
Investigators: Blersch, David , Carrano, Andres
Institution: Auburn University Main Campus
EPA Project Officer: Carleton, James N
Phase: II
Project Period: February 1, 2017 through January 31, 2019
Project Period Covered by this Report: February 1, 2017 through January 31,2018
Project Amount: \$74,310
RFA: P3 Awards: A National Student Design Competition for Sustainability Focusing on People, Prosperity and the Planet - Phase 2 (2016) Recipients Lists
Research Category: Sustainability , P3 Awards , P3 Challenge Area - Water

Objective:

The aim of the experiment is to compare the performance of a novel high-surface area biofilter media using Additive Manufacturing technology against a traditional commercial carrier already on the market for nitrogen removal.

Progress Summary:

Mathematical modeling of the carrier and fabrication

The carriers were fabricated with the goal of maximizing the capabilities of Additive Manufacturing in building complex geometries to meet at the same time the requirements for optimal bacterial development into moving beds. Such requirements are: the achievement of a high specific surface area, an optimal void size resulting in minimum clogging and enough shelter for the bacterial biofilm that prevents from sloughing.

An approach that meets the previous requirements is the gyroid, which can be represented by a mathematical surface based equation in terms of sine and cosine functions (Equation 1) that lack of straight lines (Schoen, 1970).

sin x ∗ cos y + sin y ∗ cos z + sin z ∗ cos x = 0                                    [1]

Equation 1 represents the mathematical model of the gyroid shown on Figure 1 by using Mathematica®

INSERT FIGURE 1

Figure 1: Gyroid surface

Mathematica® has the option of truncating any surface into any other 3D shape. For example, by introducing the instruction displayed on Code 1, the surface previously generated by equation 1 gains the shape of a sphere of radius 10 mm (Equation 2). The final surface is shown on Figure 2.

[Code 1]

gyroid = ContourPlot3D[Cos[𝑥]Sin[𝑦] + Cos[𝑦]Sin[𝑧] + Cos[𝑧]Sin[𝑥] == 0,

{𝑥, −3𝜋, 3𝜋}, {𝑦, −3𝜋, 3𝜋}, {𝑧, −3𝜋, 3𝜋},

RegionFunction → Function[{𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧}, 𝑥2 + 𝑦2 + 𝑧2 < 100], Extrusion → 0.50, Mesh → None, ViewPoint → {1,1,1}]

𝑥2 + 𝑦2 + 𝑧2 < 100                                                            [2]

INSERT FIGURE 2

Figure 2: Spherical gyroid surface

Modifications of code 1 resulted in three different gyroid surfaces with different truncated sphere shapes and different specific surface areas.

The conversion of the surface model to STL format is performed by Code 2

[Code 2]

Export["gyroid. stl", gyroid

For the estimation of the specific surface area, the approach was assessed by the information provided by Netfabb® software (Autodesk, Mill Valley California). Such software provides the surface area of any digital design in STL format.

The bulk volume of each printed carrier (V) was estimated by following the spherical geometry of the carrier (Equation 3)

V = 4πr3

[2]

The calculation of the specific surface area was done by dividing the surface area of the carrier by the bulk volume of it. Table 1 summarizes information for the three proposed carrier designs.

Table 1: 3D-printed carrier specific surface area information

INSERT TABLE 1

Once the 3D carriers were printed, they were soaked in a solution of sodium hydroxide (0.5% m/v) for 12 hours to allow the detachment of the support material from the inner regions of the part. Complete removal was assessed by using water jetting and mechanical scrapping.

Methodology

Two hypotheses will be subject to investigation:

1. A larger surface area on the 3D printed gyroid media carrier promotes a faster Total Ammonia Nitrogen removal (TAN) than a traditional media carrier.
2. The feature design of the high-surface area 3D printed gyroid media carrier enhances a faster TAN removal than traditional media carrier.

To prove hypothesis 1, twelve reactors are going to be built with a capacity to treat 1.3 liters of synthetic wastewater. A total of four levels of carriers will be tested during experimentation. Details of the experimental design are displayed in Table 2.

Table 2: Experimental Design for Experiment 2 to Test Hypothesis 1

Methodology

Two hypotheses will be subject to investigation:

1. A larger surface area on the 3D printed gyroid media carrier promotes a faster Total Ammonia Nitrogen removal (TAN) than a traditional media carrier.
2. The feature design of the high-surface area 3D printed gyroid media carrier enhances a faster TAN removal than traditional media carrier.

To prove hypothesis 1, twelve reactors are going to be built with a capacity to treat 1.3 liters of synthetic wastewater. A total of four levels of carriers will be tested during experimentation. Details of the experimental design are displayed in Table 2.

INSERT TABLE 2

The experimentation process will be preceded by a conditioning state where a fixed concentration of Ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) is prepared as a batch source on each bioreactor (12). Then, 716 k1 carriers (equivalent to 575 mL) will be introduced into 3 reactors with an operating capacity of 1.3 L. The same process will be repeated on the remaining reactors, but this time they will be filled with 61 3D-printed biofilters (equivalent to 575 mL): 3 reactors with 584 cm2/cm3 3D printed gyroids, another 3 reactors with 1168 cm2/cm3 3D printed gyroids and finally 3 reactors with 2310 cm2/cm3 3D printed gyroids.

Once the carriers have been introduced, the reactors will be filled with 1.3 L of synthetic water and prior operation they will be inoculated with a highly concentrated mix of nitrifying bacteria. A daily supply of the inoculum will be dosified while TAN (Total Ammonia Nitrogen) and Nitrates Nitrogen levels are monitored by photometry. Once nitrates are present in water, it will mean that the reactors will have started their cycling process. This change will be because of the nitrifying activity of the inoculated bacteria. At this point, the reactors will be ready to be tracked on their performance for removing Total Ammonia Nitrogen.

Prior to the actual experimentation, a distribution of the operational cycles of the MBSBBR reactor will be defined. The operation cycle of the reactors will include Filling Phase, Reaction Phase, Settling Phase, Decantation Phase and Idle Phase.

To prove hypothesis 2, a similar methodology will be defined, but this time instead of keeping constant the packed volume of the biocarrier, the specific surface area will do.

Hence, after experimentation to test hypothesis 1, the same twelve reactors are going to keep the same capacity to treat 1.3 litters of synthetic wastewater. A total of four levels of carriers will be tested during experimentation. Details of the experimental design are displayed in Table 3.

INSERT TABLE 3

675 mL of packed volume of K1 carrier (equivalent to 3373 cm2 of surface area) will be introduced into 3 reactors with an operating capacity of 1.3 L. The same process will be repeated on the remaining reactors, but this time 3 of them are going to be filled with 578 mL of packed volume of 3D-printed biofilters (584 m2/m3), another 3 reactors with 289 mL of packed volume of 3D-printed biofilters (1168 m2/m3), 3D printed gyroids and finally the 3 remaining reactors with 146 mL of packed volume of 3D-printed biofilters (2310 m2/m3). All these last three configurations accumulate a total surface area of 3373 cm2 as well as the k1 reactor available for the biofilm to establish.

Preliminary Experiment

Preliminary experimentation was performed following the procedure previously described, but only on two reactors filled with two type media carriers. One reactor was filled with K1 carrier and the second one with the 3D printed gyroid (1169 m2/m3). This preliminary experimentation allowed testing of the capabilities of the proposed methodology and determine the feasibility to be implemented on actual experimentation.

The configuration of the reactors was such to investigate hypothesis 1 which states that the more surface area on the 3D printed gyroid media carrier promote a faster Total Ammonia Nitrogen removal (TAN) than a traditional media carrier.

The reactors were 2 liter glass containers whose lids were drilled in the center to allow the placement of a rubber 2-holed stopper size 2. One of the holes of the stopper was used as sampling port. A plastic tube connected to the centralized air supply system of the building was passed through the other hole of the stopper to provide aeration to the reactor by means of a holed plastic ring sit on the bottom of the reactors. The purpose of locating the plastic ring on the bottom of the reactor was to continuously provide upward mobility to the biocarriers. The design of the ring was specifically thought to the 3D printed gyroid carriers, whose physical properties reported by (Elliott et al., 2017) showed a tendency to sink into the water body.

The relative pressure generated by the air supply system was controlled by a 3 PSI pressure gauge that was regulated to operate at 0.6 PSI. To provide a controlled environment for the growing of the nitrifying bacteria, the reactors were submerged into a 6 liter water bath whose temperature was adjusted by water heaters preset at 25ºC.

INSERT FIGURE 3

A summary of the operational parameters of both reactors are shown on Table 4. The synthetic water was a 1.3 liter solution of the following components: 0.0195 g. CaCO3, 0.0455 g. NaHCO3, 0.0065 g. NH4Cl (5ppm), 2.6 ml Seachem Marinesalt solution (0.1ppm) in distilled water.

INSERT TABLE 4

Both biocarriers type were introduced into their reactors and the reactors started their air diffusions. 325 µL of Nitromax (Figure 4) was inoculated in both reactors the first day and 163 µL during the following days until the presence of nitrates was detected in the reactors. Daily evaporation losses of approximately 100 mL per day were determined in both reactors. For this reason, distilled water was refilled to keep the operational water volume.

INSERT FIGURE 4

The reactors’ daily pH, temperature, ammonia, ammonium, hardness and alkalinity were tracked to control the water quality. To keep pH in range (7.4-7.7) NaHCO3 was added. Hardness, alkalinity, nitrites and nitrates were monitored by test strips, and to monitor pH a HI 98130, Hanna Instruments, Woonsocket, Rhode Island pHmeter was required. Ammonia, ammonium, nitrites and nitrates tests were carried out by photometry using a YSI 9500 photometer (Figure 28). Once cycling, the reactors were set to operate in cycles. A description of these cycles is shown in Table 5.

INSERT FIGURE 5

INSERT TABLE 5

4.2.4 Preliminary Observations for Experiment 2

After developing the methodology previously described for experiment 2, the preliminary results after running an 8.85 hour cycle shows a decrease on the TAN concentration of the treated water contained in both reactors. While the reactor with K1 biocarriers passed from 8.71 ppm to 7.92 ppm in 8 hours of reaction, the reactor with 3D printed carriers had a faster response passing from 2.18 ppm to 0.25 ppm under the same 8 hours of reaction (Figure 6).

INSERT FIGURE 6

The production of nitrates-nitrogen displayed on Figure 7 shows a better performance from the reactor with 3D printed carriers achieving a 0.452 ppm production of nitrates while the reactor with the traditional K1 carrier did not produce nitrates in the same amount of time.

INSERT FIGURE 7

Based on the observation from preliminary experiment 2, it was observed that there is a possibility that a faster TAN removal could be achieved from the MBSBBR operating with the 3D carriers, suggesting a full experimentation would be needed to draw a conclusion on this regard.

References:

Adey, W., Luckett, C., & Jensen, K. (1993). Phosphorus removal from natural waters using controlled algal production. Restoration Ecology, 1(1):29-39.

Adey, W. H., & Loveland, K. (2011). Dynamic aquaria: building living ecosystems: Academic Press.

Anastácio, P. M., Nielsen, S. N., Frias, A. F., & Marques, J. C. (1999). CRISP (crayfish and rice integrated system of production): 4. Modelling water, algae and oxygen dynamics. Ecological Modelling, 123(1):29-40. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00165-9

Andersen, R. A. (2005). Algal culturing techniques: Academic press.

Barber, J., & Tran, P. D. (2013). From natural to artificial photosynthesis. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 10(81):20120984.

Barwal, A., & Chaudhary, R. (2015). Impact of carrier filling ratio on oxygen uptake & transfer rate, volumetric oxygen transfer coefficient and energy saving potential in a lab-scale MBBR. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 8:202-208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2015.10.008

Bassin, J. P., Dias, I. N., Cao, S. M. S., Senra, E., Laranjeira, Y., & Dezotti, M. (2016). Effect of increasing organic loading rates on the performance of moving-bed biofilm reactors filled with different support media: Assessing the activity of suspended and attached biomass fractions. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 100:131-141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2016.01.007

Bhatnagar, A., Chinnasamy, S., Singh, M., & Das, K. C. (2011). Renewable biomass production by mixotrophic algae in the presence of various carbon sources and wastewaters. Applied Energy, 88(10):3425-3431. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.064

Blersch, D. M., Kangas, P. C., & Mulbry, W. W. (2013). Turbulence and nutrient interactions that control benthic algal production in an engineered cultivation raceway. Algal Research, 2(2):107-112.

Blersch, D. M., Kardel, K., Carrano, A. L., & Kaur, M. (2017). Customized 3D-printed surface topography governs species attachment preferences in a fresh water periphyton community. Algal Research, 21:52-57.

Borkar, R., Gulhane, M., & Kotangale, A. (2013). Moving bed biofilm reactor–a new perspective in wastewater treatment. Environ. Sci. Toxicol. Food Technol, 6(6):15-21.

Bose, B. K. (1994). Expert system, fuzzy logic, and neural network applications in power electronics and motion control. Proceedings of the IEEE, 82(8):1303-1323. doi:10.1109/5.301690

Brinkley, J., Johnson, C., & Souza, R. (2008). Moving bed bio film reactor technology-a full-scale installation for treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater. Chemical Business, 77:50-58.

Burkholder, J. (1996). Interactions of benthic algae with their substrata. Algal ecology-Freshwater benthic ecosystems.

Burkholder, J. M., & Wetzel, R. G. (1989). MICROBIAL COLONIZATION ON NATURAL AND ARTIFICIAL MACROPHYTES IN A PHOSPHORUS‐LIMITED, HARDWATER LAKE. Journal of Phycology, 25(1):55- 65.

Cai, T., Park, S. Y., & Li, Y. (2013). Nutrient recovery from wastewater streams by microalgae: status and prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19:360-369.

Cambridge, M., Breeman, A., Oosterwijk, R. v., & Hoek, C. v. d. (1984). Temperature responses of some North Atlantic Cladophora species (Chlorophyceae) in relation to their geographic distribution. Helgoländer Meeresuntersuchungen, 38(3):349.

Cao, J., Yuan, W., Pei, Z. J., Davis, T., Cui, Y., & Beltran, M. (2009). A Preliminary Study of the Effect of Surface Texture on Algae Cell Attachment for a Mechanical-Biological Energy Manufacturing System. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 131(6):064505. doi:10.1115/1.4000562

Carrano, A. L., Blersch, D., Kardel, K., & Khoshkhoo, A. (2016). Understanding attachment preferences of benthic algae through controlled surface topographies on 3D printed substrata. Paper presented at the 5th International Conference on Surface Metrology (ICSM 2016).

Chen, P., Min, M., Chen, Y., Wang, L., Li, Y., Chen, Q., Wang, C., Wan, Y., Wang, X., Cheng, Y., Deng, S., Hennessy, K., Lin, X., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Martinez, B., Ruan, R. (2009). Review of biological and engineering aspects of algae to fuels approach. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 2(4):1-30.

Chisti, Y. (2007). Biodiesel from microalgae. Biotechnology advances, 25(3):294-306.

Cho, S., Luong, T. T., Lee, D., Oh, Y.-K., & Lee, T. (2011). Reuse of effluent water from a municipal wastewater treatment plant in microalgae cultivation for biofuel production. Bioresource Technology, 102(18):8639-8645. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.03.037

Christenson, L., & Sims, R. (2011). Production and harvesting of microalgae for wastewater treatment, biofuels, and bioproducts. Biotechnology Advances, 29(6):686-702. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.05.015

Christiansen, D., Alexander, C. K., & Jurgen, R. K. (2005). Standard handbook of electronic engineering: McGraw Hill Professional.

Chu, L., & Wang, J. (2011). Comparison of polyurethane foam and biodegradable polymer as carriers in moving bed biofilm reactor for treating wastewater with a low C/N ratio. Chemosphere, 83(1):63- 68.

Chuntapa, B., Powtongsook, S., & Menasveta, P. (2003). Water quality control using Spirulina platensis in shrimp culture tanks. Aquaculture, 220(1):355-366. doi: 10.1016/S0044- 8486(02)00428-3

Cole, A. J., de Nys, R., & Paul, N. A. (2015). Biorecovery of nutrient waste as protein in freshwater macroalgae. Algal Research, 7:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2014.12.005

Colt, J., Lamoureux, J., Patterson, R., & Rogers, G. (2006). Reporting standards for biofilter performance studies. Aquacultural Engineering, 34(3):377-388.

Craggs, R., Sutherland, D., & Campbell, H. (2012). Hectare-scale demonstration of high rate algal ponds for enhanced wastewater treatment and biofuel production. Journal of applied phycology, 24(3):329-337.

Craggs, R. J., Adey, W. H., Jenson, K. R., John, M. S. S., Green, F. B., & Oswald, W. J. (1996). Phosphorus removal from wastewater using an algal turf scrubber. Water Science and Technology, 33(7):191-198.

Craggs, R. J., Adey, W. H., Jessup, B. K., & Oswald, W. J. (1996). A controlled stream mesocosm for tertiary treatment of sewage. Ecological Engineering, 6(1):149-169.

Cui, Y., Yuan, W., & Cao, J. (2013). Effects of surface texturing on microalgal cell attachment to solid carriers. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 6(4):44-54.

Das, P., Lei, W., Aziz, S. S., & Obbard, J. P. (2011). Enhanced algae growth in both phototrophic and mixotrophic culture under blue light. Bioresource Technology, 102(4):3883-3887.

De Godos, I., Blanco, S., García-Encina, P. A., Becares, E., & Muñoz, R. (2009). Long-term operation of high rate algal ponds for the bioremediation of piggery wastewaters at high loading rates. Bioresource Technology, 100(19):4332-4339.

Dong, Y., Fan, S.-Q., Shen, Y., Yang, J.-X., Yan, P., Chen, Y.-P., . . . Fang, F. (2015). A novel bio-carrier fabricated using 3D printing technique for wastewater treatment. Scientific Reports, 5:12400.

Dorf, R. C., & Bishop, R. H. (2011). Modern control systems: Pearson.

Ekong, J. (2017). Effect of Three Dimensional Substratum Features on Benthic Algal Biomass Productivity. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Auburn University.

Elliott, O., Gray, S., McClay, M., Nassief, B., Nunnelley, A., Vogt, E., Ekong, J., Kardel, K., Khoshkhoo, A., Proaño, G, Blersch, D.M., Carrano, A.L. (2017). Design and manufacturing of high surface area 3D‐printed media for moving bed bioreactors for wastewater treatment. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 160(1):144-156.

Geider, R. J., & La Roche, J. (2002). Redfield revisited: variability of C [ratio] N [ratio] P in marine microalgae and its biochemical basis. European Journal of Phycology, 37(1):1-17.

Golueke, C. G., Oswald, W. J., & Gotaas, H. B. (1957). Anaerobic digestion of algae. Applied Microbiology, 5(1):47.

Gong, W.-j., Liang, H., Li, W.-z., & Wang, Z.-z. (2011). Selection and evaluation of biofilm carrier in anaerobic digestion treatment of cattle manure. Energy, 36(5):3572-3578.

Graham, J. M., Auer, M. T., Canale, R. P., & Hoffmann, J. P. (1982). Ecological studies and mathematical modeling of Cladophora in Lake Huron: 4. Photosynthesis and respiration as functions of light and temperature. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 8(1):100-111.

Graham, L. E., Graham, J. M., & Wilcox, L. (2016). Algae (Third ed.): LJLM Press, LLC.

Granhag, L., Finlay, J., Jonsson, P., Callow, J., & Callow, M. (2004). Roughness-dependent removal of settled spores of the green alga Ulva (syn. Enteromorpha) exposed to hydrodynamic forces from a water jet. Biofouling, 20(2):117-122.

Guillard, R. R., & Ryther, J. H. (1962). Studies of marine planktonic diatoms: I. Cyclotella nana Hustedt, and Detonula confervacea (Cleve) Gran. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 8(2):229-239.

Guillard, R. R. L. (1975). Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates. In W. L. Smith & M.H. Chanley (Eds.), Culture of Marine Invertebrate Animals: Proceedings — 1st Conference on Culture of Marine Invertebrate Animals Greenport (pp. 29-60). Boston, MA: Springer US.

Gupta, S. K., Ansari, F. A., Nasr, M., Rawat, I., Nayunigari, M. K., & Bux, F. (2017). Cultivation of Chlorella sorokiniana and Scenedesmus obliquus in wastewater: Fuzzy intelligence for evaluation of growth parameters and metabolites extraction. Journal of Cleaner Production, 147:419-430.

Haiyunnisa, T., Alam, H. S., & Salim, T. I. (2017). Design and implementation of fuzzy logic control system for water quality control. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Automation, Cognitive Science, Optics, Micro Electro-Mechanical System, and Information Technology (ICACOMIT 2017), Jakarta Indonesia, October 23-24.

Harlin, M., & Lindbergh, J. (1977). Selection of substrata by seaweeds: optimal surface relief. Marine Biology, 40(1):33-40.

Hassan, M. F., Lee, H. P., & Lim, S. P. (2012). Effects of shear and surface roughness on reducing the attachment of Oscillatoria sp. filaments on substrates. Water Environment Research, 84(9):744-752. doi: 10.2175/106143012X13407275694635

Hayder, G., Ahmed, A. N., & Fu’ad, N. F. S. M. (2017). A review on media clogging in attached growth system. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(19):8034-8039.

Hofman, T., & Lees, H. (1953). The biochemistry of the nitrifying organisms. 4. The respiration and intermediary metabolism of Nitrosomonas. Biochemical Journal, 54(4):579.

Irving, T. E., & Allen, D. G. (2011). Species and material considerations in the formation and development of microalgal biofilms. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 92(2):283-294.

John, R. P., Anisha, G. S., Nampoothiri, K. M., & Pandey, A. (2011). Micro and macroalgal biomass: A renewable source for bioethanol. Bioresource Technology, 102(1):186-193. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.139

Jones, M.C., Cheung, W.W.L. (2018). Using fuzzy logic to determine the vulnerability of marine species to climate change. Global Change Biology, 24(2):e719-e731.

Kamstra, A., Blom, E., Terjesen, B. F. (2017). Mixing and scale affect moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) performance. Aquacultural Engineering, 78:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2017.04.004

Kardel, K., Carrano, A. L., Blersch, D. M., Kaur, M. (2015). Preliminary development of 3D-printed custom substrata for benthic algal biofilms. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing, 2(1):12-19. doi:10.1089/3dp.2014.0024

Kaur, M. (2016). Effect of substratum topography on algal turf colonization and productivity under different nutrient conditions. Master's Thesis, Auburn University, July 28.

Kim, Y., Shin, H. S., & Plummer, J. D. (2014). A wavelet-based autoregressive fuzzy model for forecasting algal blooms. Environmental Modelling & Software, 62:1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.08.014

Kinyage, J. P. H., Pedersen, L.-F. (2016). Impact of temperature on ammonium and nitrite removal rates in RAS moving bed biofilters. Aquacultural Engineering, 75:51-55. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2016.10.006

Leavitt, P. R., & Hodgson, D. A. (2002). Sedimentary pigments. In: Last, W.M., Smol, J.P., eds. Tracking Environmental Change Using Lake Sediments. Volume 1.  The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 295-325.

Lester, W. W., Adams, M. S., & Farmer, A. M. (1988). Effects of light and temperature on photosynthesis of the nuisance alga Cladophora glomerata (L.) Kutz from Green Bay, Lake Michigan. New Phytologist, 109(1):53-58.

Levstek, M., & Plazl, I. (2009). Influence of carrier type on nitrification in the moving-bed biofilm process. Water Science and Technology, 59(5):875-882. doi: 10.2166/wst.2009.037

Linko, P. (1988). Uncertainties, fuzzy reasoning, and expert systems in bioengineering. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 542(1):83-101.

Lloyd, S. W., & Tucker, C. S. (1988). Comparison of three solvent systems for extraction of chlorophyll a from fish pond phytoplankton communities. Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 19(2):36-40.

Maddahi, Z., Jalalian, A., Zarkesh, M., & Honarjo, N. (2015). Providing a soil fertility map using geographic information system, geostatistical techniques and fuzzy logic. AES Bioflux, 7(1):131-138.

Mahmoudkhani, R., Azar, A. M., Dehghani, A., & Goreishi, H. (2012). Treatment of Contaminated Waters with Petroleum by Moving Bed Biofilm Reactor (MBBR). Paper presented at the International Conference on Life Science and Engineering, doi: 10.7763/IPCBEE.

Mantoura, R., & Llewellyn, C. (1983). The rapid determination of algal chlorophyll and carotenoid pigments and their breakdown products in natural waters by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. Analytica Chimica Acta, 151:297-314.

Marsili-Libelli, S. (2004). Fuzzy prediction of the algal blooms in the Orbetello lagoon. Environmental Modelling & Software, 19(9):799-808. doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2003.03.008

Mayo, A. W. (1997). Effects of temperature and pH on the kinetic growth of unialga Chlorella vulgaris cultures containing bacteria. Water Environment Research, 69(1):64-72.

Metcalf, E., & Eddy, H. (2003). Wastewater engineering: treatment and reuse. In: Techobanoglous G, Burton FL, Stensel HD, eds. Wastewater Engineering, Treatment, Disposal and Reuse. New Dehli, India: Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, 4th edition.

Miller, A. R., Lowe, R. L., & Rotenberry, J. T. (1987). Succession of diatom communities on sand grains. Journal of Ecology, 75(3):693-709. doi:10.2307/2260200

Miranda, G. H. B., & Felipe, J. C. (2015). Computer-aided diagnosis system based on fuzzy logic for breast cancer categorization. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 64:334-346.

Mulbry, W., Kondrad, S., Pizarro, C., & Kebede-Westhead, E. (2008). Treatment of dairy manure effluent using freshwater algae: algal productivity and recovery of manure nutrients using pilot-scale algal turf scrubbers. Bioresource Technology, 99(17):8137-8142.

Naegel, L. C. A. (1977). Combined production of fish and plants in recirculating water. Aquaculture, 10(1):17-24. doi: 10.1016/0044-8486(77)90029-1

Neveux, N., Magnusson, M., Mata, L., Whelan, A., de Nys, R., & Paul, N. A. (2016). The treatment of municipal wastewater by the macroalga Oedogonium sp. and its potential for the production of biocrude. Algal Research, 13:284-292. doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2015.12.010

Neveux, N., Yuen, A., Jazrawi, C., He, Y., Magnusson, M., Haynes, B., . . . Maschmeyer, T. (2014). Pre-and post-harvest treatment of macroalgae to improve the quality of feedstock for hydrothermal liquefaction. Algal Research, 6:22-31.

Nikitin, D. (1973). Electron microscopic studies of attached microorganisms. Modem methods in the study of microbial ecology. Bull. Swed. Nat. Sci. Res. Counc, 17:85-91.

Norton, T. A., & Fetter, R. (1981). The settlement of Sargassum muticum propagules in stationary and flowing water. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 61(4):929-940.

Ødegaard, H. (1999). The moving bed biofilm reactor. In: Igarashi, T., Watanabe, Y., Asano, T., Tambo, N. Water Environmental Engineering and Reuse of Water, Sapporo, Japan: Hokkaido Shimbun Press, pp. 205-305.

Ødegaard, H., Rusten, B., & Wessman, F. (2004). State of the art in Europe of the moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) process. Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, 2004(16):348-354. doi: 10.2175/193864704784147610

Ødegaard, H., Rusten, B., & Westrum, T. (1994). A new moving bed biofilm reactor-applications and results. Water Science and Technology, 29(10-11):157-165.

Pizarro, C., Kebede-Westhead, E., & Mulbry, W. (2002). Nitrogen and phosphorus removal rates using small algal turfs grown with dairy manure. Journal of Applied Phycology, 14(6):469-473.

Pulz, O. (2001). Photobioreactors: production systems for phototrophic microorganisms. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 57(3):287-293.

Reed, D. C., Laur, D. R., & Ebeling, A. W. (1988). Variation in algal dispersal and recruitment: the importance of episodic events. Ecological Monographs, 58(4):321-335.

Rusten, B., Eikebrokk, B., Ulgenes, Y., & Lygren, E. (2006). Design and operations of the Kaldnes moving bed biofilm reactors. Aquacultural Engineering, 34(3):322-331. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaeng.2005.04.002

Rusten, B., Mattsson, E., Broch-Due, A., & Westrum, T. (1994). Treatment of pulp and paper industry wastewaters in novel moving bed biofilm reactors. Water Science and Technology, 30(3):161-171.

Schoen, A. H. (1970). Infinite Periodic Minimal Surfaces Without Self-Intersections. Technical Report No. 19700020472. Washington, DC: NASA, May 1.

Schulze, P. S. C., Pereira, H. G. C., Santos, T. F. C., Schueler, L., Guerra, R., Barreira, L. A., . . . Varela, J. C. S. (2016). Effect of light quality supplied by light emitting diodes (LEDs) on growth and biochemical profiles of Nannochloropsis oculata and Tetraselmis chuii. Algal Research, 16:387-398. doi: 10.1016/j.algal.2016.03.034

Sheath, R. G. (1984). The biology of freshwater red algae. Progress in Phycological Research, 3:89-157.

Sigrimis, N., Antsaklis, P., & Groumpos, P. P. (2001). Advances in control of agriculture and the environment. IEEE Control Systems, 21(5):8-12. doi:10.1109/37.954516

Sindelar, H. R., Yap, J. N., Boyer, T. H., & Brown, M. T. (2015). Algae scrubbers for phosphorus removal in impaired waters. Ecological Engineering, 85:144-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.09.002

Sivanandam, S., Sumathi, S., & Deepa, S. (2007). Introduction to Fuzzy Logic using MATLAB.  Vol. 1, Berlin Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 430 pp.

Sombatsompop, K., Songpim, A., Reabroi, S., & Inkong-ngam, P. (2011). A comparative study of sequencing batch reactor and movingbed sequencing batch reactor for piggery wastewater treatment. Maejo International Journal of Science and Technology, 5(2):191-203.

Suganya, T., Varman, M., Masjuki, H. H., & Renganathan, S. (2016). Macroalgae and microalgae as a potential source for commercial applications along with biofuels production: A biorefinery approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 55:909-941. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.11.026

Sullivan, M., & Currin, C. (2002). Community structure and functional dynamics of benthic microalgae in salt marshes. In:  Weinstein, M.P., Kreeger, D.A., eds. Concepts and Controversies in Tidal Marsh Ecology. Dordecht, The Netherlands: Springer, pp. 81-106.

Swanson, J., & Kittelson, D. (2008). A method to measure static charge on a filter used for gravimetric analysis. Aerosol Science and Technology, 42(9):714-721.

Ugwu, C. U., Aoyagi, H., & Uchiyama, H. (2008). Photobioreactors for mass cultivation of algae. Bioresource Technology, 99(10):4021-4028. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.046

Vogel, S. (1981). Life in Moving Fluids: The Physical Biology of Flow. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Wilkie, A. C., & Mulbry, W. W. (2002). Recovery of dairy manure nutrients by benthic freshwater algae. Bioresource Technology, 84(1):81-91.

Zadeh, L. A. (1973). Outline of a new approach to the analysis of complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 1:28-44.

Journal Articles on this Report : 2 Displayed | Download in RIS Format

 Other project views: All 4 publications 2 publications in selected types All 2 journal articles
Type Citation Project Document Sources
Journal Article Blersch DM, Kangas PC, Mulbry WW. Turbulence and nutrient interactions that control benthic algal production in an engineered cultivation raceway. Algal Research 2013;2(2):107-112. SV836951 (2017)
• Full-text: USDA-Full Text PDF
• Abstract: ScienceDirect-Abstract
Exit
• Journal Article Blersch DM, Kardel K, Carrano AL, Kaur M. Customized 3D-printed surface topography governs species attachment preferences in a fresh water periphyton community. Algal Research 2017:21:52-57. SV836951 (2017)
• Abstract: ScienceDirect-Abstract
Exit

• P3 Phase I:

Development of 3D-printed surfaces for ultra-high surface area trickling biofilters for water pollution remediation  | Final Report