Grantee Research Project Results
Journal Publications Details for Grant Number R824740
A Framework to Compare Polices for Source Reduction
RFA:
Incentives and Impediments to Pollution Prevention (1995)
Other Views
- All
Publications - Selected
Publication Types - Journal
Articles - Publications Submitted
After Final Report - Redisplay this page without
Reference Title, Journal, and Author Columns - Display this Page
in RIS Format
| Reference Type | Reference Title | Journal | Author | Citation | Progress Report Year | Document Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Article | Environmental levies and distortionary taxation: Comment | THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW | Fullerton D | Fullerton D. Environmental levies and distortionary taxation: Comment. American Economic Review 1997;87(1):245-251 |
R824740 (Final) |
not available |
| Journal Article | Policies for green design. | JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT | Fullerton D, Wu W | Fullerton D, Wu W. Policies for green design. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 1998;36:131-148. |
R824740 (Final) |
not available |
| Journal Article | The Case for a Two-Part Instrument: Presumptive Tax and Environmental Subsidy | NBER Working Paper | Fullerton D | Fullerton D. The Case for a Two-Part Instrument: Presumptive Tax and Environmental Subsidy. NBER Working Paper 1997/04//;():No. W5993 |
R824740 (Final) |
not available |
| Journal Article | Environmental Taxes and the Double-Dividend Hypothesis: Did You Really Expect Something for Nothing? | NBER Working Paper | Fullerton D, Metcalf G | Fullerton D, Metcalf G. Environmental Taxes and the Double-Dividend Hypothesis: Did You Really Expect Something for Nothing?. NBER Working Paper 1997/09//;():No.W6199 |
R824740 (Final) |
not available |
The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.