Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

Surface Complexation Model to Describe Competitive Arsenic Adsorption onto Iron Oxides

EPA Grant Number: F07A20355
Title: Surface Complexation Model to Describe Competitive Arsenic Adsorption onto Iron Oxides
Investigators: Epps, Amanda Van
Institution: The University of Texas at Austin
EPA Project Officer: Lee, Sonja
Project Period: January 1, 2007 through January 1, 2010
RFA: STAR Graduate Fellowships (2007) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Academic Fellowships , Drinking Water , Fellowship - Environmental

Objective:

Advances in technology for removing arsenic from drinking water are of critical importance both in the U.S. and worldwide. Research into means of low-cost treatment for removal of arsenic has led to the development of a “solar oxidation and removal of arsenic” (SORAS) process in which sunlight, lemon juice, and air are used to remove arsenic from drinking water. Because the system relies only on these three things, it holds promise for low-cost arsenic removal in places such as Bangladesh where there is widespread arsenic contamination in groundwater but little large-scale treatment of drinking water.

It is difficult, however, to predict how much arsenic can be removed because of the interference of background water chemistry on the arsenic adsorption processes. Recent work at the University of Texas at Austin has attempted to develop a surface complexation and mass transport model for the removal of arsenic in a packed bed of granular ferric hydroxide. The model should allow prediction of arsenic removal based on known groundwater characteristics in the same way that existing models predict removal of organic contaminants by granular activated carbon. Developing a similar model to predict the effectiveness of SORAS would need to account for the effects of silica, carbonate, calcium, and citrate.

The objective of this research is to use both equilibrium adsorption data and spectroscopic studies to develop such a model for SORAS. The model would describe arsenic adsorption onto amorphous ferric hydroxide in a multi-solute system.

Approach:

The research approach will be to collect experimental data to isolate and understand the effect that each of the four solutes (silica, carbonate, calcium, and citrate) alone has on arsenic removal. Next, both experimental and spectroscopic data for combinations of these ions will be studied to determine the effect of multi-solute systems on arsenic removal. These data will be used to develop solute parameters for a surface complexation model. Finally, experimental results will be compared to those predicted by this model, and the model’s ability to predict experimental results will be evaluated.

Expected Results:

The output of this work would be a set of self-consistent model parameters that would describe the adsorption of arsenic onto iron oxides in the presence of other solutes. The model could be used to predict the potential for removal of arsenic from drinking water by adsorption onto iron oxides and the expected effectiveness of the system based on background water chemistry.

Supplemental Keywords:

arsenic, SORAS, adsorption, iron oxides, surface complexation, mathematical model, carbonate, silica, calcium, citrate,, RFA, Scientific Discipline, Water, Drinking Water, Environmental Engineering, treatment, remediation, drinking water contaminants, drinking water treatment, drinking water monitoring, modeling

Progress and Final Reports:

  • 2007
  • 2008
  • Final
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.