Skip to main content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Here’s how you know

Dot gov

Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.

HTTPS

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you have safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

  • Environmental Topics
  • Laws & Regulations
  • Report a Violation
  • About EPA
Contact Us

Grantee Research Project Results

An Examination of Utility Consistent Approaches to Modeling Corner Solutions in Recreation Demand

EPA Grant Number: R826615
Title: An Examination of Utility Consistent Approaches to Modeling Corner Solutions in Recreation Demand
Investigators: Herriges, Joseph A. , Kling, Catherine L. , Phaneuf, Daniel J.
Current Investigators: Herriges, Joseph A. , Phaneuf, Daniel J. , Kling, Catherine L.
Institution: Iowa State University
Current Institution: Iowa State University , North Carolina State University
EPA Project Officer: Chung, Serena
Project Period: September 1, 1998 through August 31, 2001 (Extended to October 31, 2000)
Project Amount: $134,759
RFA: Decision-Making and Valuation for Environmental Policy (1998) RFA Text |  Recipients Lists
Research Category: Environmental Justice

Description:

Recreation demand models are used extensively to value existing recreation facilities, as well policies that change the quality attributes and number of recreation sites. However, currently popular modeling frameworks such as those that link a site selection model with a separate participation equation, while providing useful insight into the recreation usage, are hampered by the lack of an underlying utility theoretic framework. The Kuhn-Tucker model, as well as its dual counterpart, provides a promising alternative approach that unifies the site selection and participation decisions in a utility theoretic framework. These models provide a consistent treatment from the behavioral model to the estimating equations. Unfortunately, there has been only limited experience with either of these models to date. The proposed research project is aimed at expanding both our understanding of these models and procedures that will facilitate their use in applied welfare analysis.

Approach:

The proposed research project will

  • Investigate modeling, specification, and econometric issues associated with utility consistent corner solution models in recreation demand.
  • Compare traditional approaches of modeling recreation demand to the utility consistent methods.
  • Apply these utility consistent methods to data sets describing recreation use of the Wisconsin Great Lakes Region and Iowa Wetlands..

Expected Results:

It is anticipated that the research will provide three specific benefits. First, by relaxing both the functional form used to represent individual preferences and the error structure employed to capture variation in preferences, we will expand the range of preferences that the Kuhn-Tucker model can accurately reflect. Second, our Monte Carlo simulation efforts will provide a better understanding of the tradeoffs between established methods for modeling recreation demand, which rely on standard econometric techniques, and the utility consistent approaches, which present greater (but feasible) challenges in terms of estimation. The simulation exercise will also provide insight into the robustness of Kuhn-Tucker and dual models to changes in modeling assumptions. Finally, while Monte Carlo exercises are useful in examining the performance of a model or estimator over a range of underlying conditions and in a controlled setting, they are often criticized for avoiding real world problems. The application of both the Kuhn-Tucker and dual models to two data sets the will provide insights into the problems encountered in actual valuation settings. The wetland valuation effort, in particular, is of current policy relevance, given proposed federal and state changes to the number and quality of wetlands in the Midwest.

Publications and Presentations:

Publications have been submitted on this project: View all 16 publications for this project

Journal Articles:

Journal Articles have been submitted on this project: View all 7 journal articles for this project

Supplemental Keywords:

recreation demand, water, non-market valuation, wetlands., RFA, Scientific Discipline, Geographic Area, Economic, Social, & Behavioral Science Research Program, Economics & Decision Making, Ecological Risk Assessment, State, Economics, decision-making, Social Science, Ecology and Ecosystems, IOWA (IA), Monte Carlo study, utility consistant approaches, belief system, non-market valuation, utility consistent approaches, behavior model, ecosystem valuation, behavior change, corner solution, environmental values, wetlands planning, decision analysis, recreational demand, Wisconsin (WI), econometric analysis, environmental policy

Relevant Websites:

Joseph A. Herriges Exit

Progress and Final Reports:

  • 1999 Progress Report
  • 2000 Progress Report
  • Final Report
  • Top of Page

    The perspectives, information and conclusions conveyed in research project abstracts, progress reports, final reports, journal abstracts and journal publications convey the viewpoints of the principal investigator and may not represent the views and policies of ORD and EPA. Conclusions drawn by the principal investigators have not been reviewed by the Agency.

    Project Research Results

    • Final Report
    • 2000 Progress Report
    • 1999 Progress Report
    16 publications for this project
    7 journal articles for this project

    Site Navigation

    • Grantee Research Project Results Home
    • Grantee Research Project Results Basic Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Advanced Search
    • Grantee Research Project Results Fielded Search
    • Publication search
    • EPA Regional Search

    Related Information

    • Search Help
    • About our data collection
    • Research Grants
    • P3: Student Design Competition
    • Research Fellowships
    • Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)
    Contact Us to ask a question, provide feedback, or report a problem.
    Last updated April 28, 2023
    United States Environmental Protection Agency

    Discover.

    • Accessibility
    • Budget & Performance
    • Contracting
    • EPA www Web Snapshot
    • Grants
    • No FEAR Act Data
    • Plain Writing
    • Privacy
    • Privacy and Security Notice

    Connect.

    • Data.gov
    • Inspector General
    • Jobs
    • Newsroom
    • Open Government
    • Regulations.gov
    • Subscribe
    • USA.gov
    • White House

    Ask.

    • Contact EPA
    • EPA Disclaimers
    • Hotlines
    • FOIA Requests
    • Frequent Questions

    Follow.